Walterp
Member
- Location
- Pembrokeshire
I have a florin on 'revoke' as the logical outcome of the constitutional mess in which the UK finds itself. I expect all those who don't agree with my analysis to pay up, if I am proved correct. I will return to claim my winnings.
On the question of correctness, the pretend barrister 'Danllan' has been providing legal advice about the legal systems in the UK (there are three, not one as he claims). His advice is just plain wrong.
A simple example - if someone is killed it is 'unlawful' and also a criminal act, and a civil wrong.
He may have a law degree from somewhere, a long time ago, but his legal understanding is woeful. There is a reason why he is so shy of telling you about that, isn't there?
Signed: Walter Price LL.B (Hons) retired Solicitor of the Supreme Court.
On the question of correctness, the pretend barrister 'Danllan' has been providing legal advice about the legal systems in the UK (there are three, not one as he claims). His advice is just plain wrong.
A simple example - if someone is killed it is 'unlawful' and also a criminal act, and a civil wrong.
He may have a law degree from somewhere, a long time ago, but his legal understanding is woeful. There is a reason why he is so shy of telling you about that, isn't there?
Signed: Walter Price LL.B (Hons) retired Solicitor of the Supreme Court.