- Location
- Scottish Highlands
Nothing in imperial except historic drawings. Which contemporary design standard would you be producing to if using inches?So you have never seen a drawing with a tolerance of +or - .0002”
Nothing in imperial except historic drawings. Which contemporary design standard would you be producing to if using inches?So you have never seen a drawing with a tolerance of +or - .0002”
Imperial gallon | 277.4194 cubic inches |
US dry gallon | 268.8025 cubic inches |
US liquid gallon | 231 cubic inches |
My brain won’t go back far enough to start quoting iso numbers .. suffice to say I can assure you as an apprentice in the 80’s we worked to drawings with tolerance’s measured in thousandths , the advent of cnc machining, cad design etc will I admit have replaced/ negated the old ways .Nothing in imperial except historic drawings. Which contemporary design standard would you be producing to if using inches?
Isn’t it totally ridiculous that we still measure distance in miles! All this conversion for working out fuel consumption could be avoided if kilometres were used and the litres per 100kms is so much more logical than mpg where better economy is expressed as a rising figure of distance rather than the more sensible metric method of lowering volume of fuel over a set distance.How many miles to the gallon does your car do ?
Here's a shock for you - the 80s were 40-odd years ago. I would be very surprised if any ISO standards use inches any more.My brain won’t go back far enough to start quoting iso numbers .. suffice to say I can assure you as an apprentice in the 80’s we worked to drawings with tolerance’s measured in thousandths , the advent of cnc machining, cad design etc will I admit have replaced/ negated the old ways .
Back on topic, I would think most of us of a certain age will have been taught both measuring systems and adapt to what we are comfortable with, I measure distance on the farm in meters ie fence lines, but feed in kilograms, mix lambs milk replacement in grams, and drive 7 miles to the garage for x amount of litres of diesel as my pickup only does 25 mpg
You're right if it's like any of the precision engineers I know."thou" is still the most commonly used term in precision engineering though.
Funny, but mpg is one of the few I still use. I don't like the 'l/100km' measure as I feel it doesn't have as obvious a difference between good and bad.Isn’t it totally ridiculous that we still measure distance in miles! All this conversion for working out fuel consumption could be avoided if kilometres were used and the litres per 100kms is so much more logical than mpg where better economy is expressed as a rising figure of distance rather than the more sensible metric method of lowering volume of fuel over a set distance.
Im just waiting for someone to proclaim this is a Brexit benefit!!!
I gave up listening to that prat a long time ago, if thats all he can come up with we really are in a bigger mess than anyone in government will ever admit too.Funny, but mpg is one of the few I still use. I don't like the 'l/100km' measure as I feel it doesn't have as obvious a difference between good and bad.
JRM has, on multiple occassions.
I am fully aware of when it was , those of us who trained in them times will still often refer to thousandths , another thing modern “ engineers” seem to have a beef with is those of us whe served an old fashioned apprenticeship of 4 plus years with the obligatory college release night schools calling ourselves engineer because we didn’t go to uni, I “only “ did my HND as I preferred to be on the tools , my brother much later in life did his degree and said to my daughter,Here's a shock for you - the 80s were 40-odd years ago. I would be very surprised if any ISO standards use inches any more.
And half 20 is 10Keep miles.
Keep pints of beer.
I work in inches in the workshop, it is easier to half things - half 4 and 7/8 is exactly 2 and 7/16 for example.
Base 12 has a lot to recommend it - hours in a day was sorted out thousands of years ago.
And still use feet and inchesGreat idea when the whole workforce up to the age of about 60 has been educated in the metric system
Strange how “old fashioned” thousandths are arrived at by multiplying 10 x 10 x 10I am fully aware of when it was , those of us who trained in them times will still often refer to thousandths ……!
Maybe we should go back to it thenStrange how “old fashioned” thousandths are arrived at by multiplying 10 x 10 x 10
By the acre I sellYou sell seed in kilos though?
Should really have been in 1024 ths - but then again maybe it wasn’t meant to be as accurateMaybe we should go back to it then
We wouldn’t be able to pick up the feeler gaugesShould really have been in 1024 ths - but then again maybe it wasn’t meant to be as accurate