May told France about Hinkley Point delay British PM informed François Hollande twice but message wa

Zetor

Member
Location
Northumberland
Never thought I'd see the day when renewables could provide 25% of the uk's electrical needs which they did in January/February, Although I can't imagine they'll ever achieve 100% but with more investment I'm sure 50% could be achieved?
 

renewablejohn

Member
Location
lancs
Never thought I'd see the day when renewables could provide 25% of the uk's electrical needs which they did in January/February, Although I can't imagine they'll ever achieve 100% but with more investment I'm sure 50% could be achieved?

Why not 100% renewables other countries can achieve this so why not UK when we have such excellent renewable resources.
 

renewablejohn

Member
Location
lancs
Never thought I'd see the day when renewables could provide 25% of the uk's electrical needs which they did in January/February, Although I can't imagine they'll ever achieve 100% but with more investment I'm sure 50% could be achieved?

Not just Jan and Feb the total for 2015 was 25% (24.6) being a greater contribution than either coal or nuclear for the first time. Only gas is higher.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploa..._data/file/541318/DUKES_2016_Press_Notice.pdf
 

Fuzzy

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Bedfordshire
Hinkley site should never have been used for a critical project like a power station.
Its only a short time ago that a demonstration of the stupidity of putting a nuclear reactor
on a low lying site next to the sea was shown. The Canaries are ex volcanos, one of which
is in the foreseeable future going to split and cause a tidal wave capable of reaching England
and wiping out hinkley point.
Added to this is the improvements to solar and other renewables backed by battery tech,
fully capable of providing the UK energy needs. T he power station could be redundant before its
commissioned
The Canaries thing is a load of ballcocks, research sponsored by an American Insurance company that sell damage insurance !!!!! A Nuclear power station needs to be near a guaranteed and plentiful supply of water, in the UK and most of the world it is the sea that provides it. Each reactor needs about 300,000 gallons of water per minute for cooling in the event of a problem. (Hence in the Japan Tsunami you see what happens when the water supply (or power to the pumps) to the reactor fails).
Renewables and energy storage (battery or HEP via reservoirs) is the way ahead.
 

renewablejohn

Member
Location
lancs

rob1

Member
Location
wiltshire
Because that would be sensible and gives little scope for brown envelopes.
always assumed there were vested interests twisting the decisions why we dont usemore river power in this country is beyond me,we have a river through the farm which is about two ft deep and ten ft wide in summer and would love to use it to produce power but trying to get any one interested seems impossible, it used to run a feed mill off a leat so must be decent flow
 

Exfarmer

Member
Location
Bury St Edmunds
always assumed there were vested interests twisting the decisions why we dont usemore river power in this country is beyond me,we have a river through the farm which is about two ft deep and ten ft wide in summer and would love to use it to produce power but trying to get any one interested seems impossible, it used to run a feed mill off a leat so must be decent flow
Most of these old water mills were only 2-5 hp the largest in Norfolk, for that is near where I live was about 7 hp ie 5 Kw . Not going to power an awful lot
 

Y Fan Wen

Member
Location
N W Snowdonia
is there anyway of testing it?
First you measure the amount of flow in cubic feet or meters per second. Then the difference in height called head.
If you have 18 feet of head and one cubic foot of flow then you have the potential for producing one kilowatt.
18 cubic feet and one foot of fall gives the same.
 

renewablejohn

Member
Location
lancs
Most of these old water mills were only 2-5 hp the largest in Norfolk, for that is near where I live was about 7 hp ie 5 Kw . Not going to power an awful lot

Makes me laugh an attitude like this. You put 4kw solar on your roof and on a sunny day you will be lucky to get 10 hours production and virtually nothing in winter and thats viewed as a good investment. Yet 5kw generating 24/7 or on demand is not going to power an awful lot. What people fail to grasp is 24/7 thats a guaranteed 120 kw which could be averaged at 5kw per hour but far more useful as a peaking plant on demand as 120kw for 1 hour.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 120 38.8%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 118 38.2%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 42 13.6%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 6 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 5 1.6%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 18 5.8%

Expanded and improved Sustainable Farming Incentive offer for farmers published

  • 252
  • 1
Expanded Sustainable Farming Incentive offer from July will give the sector a clear path forward and boost farm business resilience.

From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and The Rt Hon Sir Mark Spencer MP Published21 May 2024

s300_Farmland_with_farmFarmland_with_farmhouse_and_grazing_cattle_in_the_UK_Farm_scene__diversification__grazing__rural__beef_GettyImages-165174232.jpg

Full details of the expanded and improved Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) offer available to farmers from July have been published by the...
Top