I run 540 65 r38 and 440 65 28 on mineFound a brochure online
View attachment 252042
380/70 R28 and 480/70 R38 listed as an option. Wonder if 100 mm wider would still work?
But like you said will need wider rims anyway, so it's probably a no go. Just know of some cheap tyres the size in OP, thinking out loud really...
MF 6260 with 14.9 R28 (equivalent to 380/85 R28) front and 18.4 R38 (equivalent to 460/85 R38) rear.
Does anyone know if 480/70 R28 and 580/70 R38 would fit, and work with inter axle ratio?
Thank you.
520/85 R38 is equivalent of 20.8 R38 and 420/85 R28 is equivalent of 16.9 R28 so it seems?
Given 20.8 R38 and 16.9 R28 is an option on the bigger models, as well as 18.4 R38 and 14.9 R28, then the 520/85 and 420/85 should go on 6260 without a problem ratio wise? I think rear fenders are the same throughout range too, so should fit?
Yes, it is the same size, just in mm and inches
Ration is almost the same, and is a perfectly fine alternative. In USA they use tyre groups to differ tyres. a 520/85R38 would be a group 46 and 420/85R28 would be group 41. Then tractor manufactures just state the difference in groups between axles, and then you are free to fit any tyre combination you like, as long as you keep eg. a 5 group difference between front and rear axle.
I've found an example that explains it a little and has some examples of tyres in the different groups. http://salesmanual.deere.com/sales/.../8r/understanding_basic_tire_information.html