Recent content by Danllan

Please cite examples of the US organising mass rapes, approved mass murder and the stealing of children. As for copying, you seem unaware of Russia's military history. It is very odd that you won't make a simple condemnation of Russia.

Are those opposed to deportations to Rwanda opposed to the principle in general, or just because is it the UK that is proposing to do it?

Since you condemn the US so readily, why will you not condemn Russia too?

Not really, though something predictable from you. If the e.g. the ONS, NAO etc. publish some stat's, they will have been publicly audited and can be referred to as a reliable primary source. If a given politician or recognised expert in whatever has stated something, in speech or in written...

I am not and have not been arguing, merely presenting the demonstrable facts - odd that you agree with these when they suit you, but do not do so when they don't. Self recognition is a commendable thing, I applaud you. (y)

No. No. You are both arguing the toss for the sake of it. Many, probably most things we discuss are readily verifiable. We have access to independently verified stat's, we can watch actual interviews in which people say things and we can post them, we find and link to virtually anything ever...

That is true to a point; however, it is very easy to demonstrate that someone is wrong by using a link to a generally accepted credible source.

This has been argued to death in the Courts... as things stand if someone states something as honest belief it may still be untrue; but it is only a lie if deceit is intended. However the test can be subjective on the basis that an average person can be expected to make a reasonable and...

How many times have I asked you one simple question and not had a response...? And the reason for your continuing evasion is that the only possible honest response will undermine your entire 'contribution' to this thread. Anyway, I think I can manage to bear the derision of a fellow like you. :)

No, I'll keep my anonymity regardless of your taunts. As for Nexus... some very talented people there, but they have a decided political agenda too. Mansfield is a self-agrandising self-publicist of the first order, very clever, but has been labelled a colossal hypocrite in his politics and...

I put our men's lives ahead of all others, and I have been one of them. But that doesn't mean that when it is in our country's strategic interest they shouldn't be deployed. As stated earlier, I would much rather we Ukraine everything necessary to defeat Russia, everything. Yet rather than see a...

They are to me, of course they are, what a f^cking stupid question to ask... That doesn't mean our troops shouldn't be deployed independently or in coalition with others, but the day anyone in office ever places our men's lives anywhere other than as being of the foremost importance, is the day...

I repeat... this is not state seizure it is via a Court order, this is an established thing. But even if it were not, which it is, please advise of any case that has removed the Courts' prerogative to set precedence. Below is a link to another, more recent FT article...

What do you want to happen in this regard, and why?

No you idiot, a Court Order is the precise opposite of 'illegal', it is the law being enforced. There is already precedent in the the Common Law jurisdictions for other states to sue one another for funds held within them. This is not HMG 'confiscating' or taking anything, it is the Sovereign...