Most people are “playing by the rules”.
It’s a good job that there’s no doubt about the accuracy of the tests.
False positive pseudoepidemic anyone. :unsure:
I appreciate I struggle to articulate my points, but this (if the link works) is an Interesting watch. Spend half an hour of your time considering an alternative point of view...
More good examples of those in power (or attempting to gain power) misleading and “the public” being easily misled. Thanks for reinforcing my point. :)
I don’t think there’s a conspiracy, just incompetence, ignorance and a willingness, a necessity even, by those in power to double down on their mistakes. How often do politicians admit they got it wrong?
Interesting that you use the example of the risk of transmission of bse/cjd ? from eating “infected” meat. I would guess that there was a fair chance that Gummer knew the risks were minuscule, even then and that the whole thing was over blown... predictions of mass deaths by numerous experts...
I remember Blair refusing to confirm whether his youngest had had the MMR vaccine. It made no sense to me, as he could have just been honest and put any doubts to bed.
You’ve hit the nail on the head. Trust, I imagine has never been lower and even more ironic coming from a sh1t stirrer supreme.
“They” have had to lie to convince us to comply with an unjustified lockdown.
Once again, a lack of transparency does confidence no favours.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.