Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Tenant Farming, Subsidies, BPS & Legal Issues
AHA Rents, DFRA “Farming is Changing” and "No Deal" Brexit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Austin7" data-source="post: 6526387" data-attributes="member: 42100"><p>I would absolutely agree with you if I were considering an FBT tenancy. Historically in the 1870's and again in the 1920's and 30's that is what happened. Farmers walked away from their farms and in many cases landlords could not find replacements, the land tumbled down to brambles and weeds on ly tobe recultivated in 1940. An AHA tenancy is a different beast. Our tenancy as with many others arose from a joint purchase by landlord and tenant, the tenant therefore has an equity interest in the land. The basis of this partnership between landlord and tenant is laid out in The Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. Both Landlord and Tenant are bound, profits are shared. This is unlike FBT's which are market driven and where the tenant has no equity interest in the land and no on going rights beyond the specific tenancy term. Chalk and cheese.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Austin7, post: 6526387, member: 42100"] I would absolutely agree with you if I were considering an FBT tenancy. Historically in the 1870's and again in the 1920's and 30's that is what happened. Farmers walked away from their farms and in many cases landlords could not find replacements, the land tumbled down to brambles and weeds on ly tobe recultivated in 1940. An AHA tenancy is a different beast. Our tenancy as with many others arose from a joint purchase by landlord and tenant, the tenant therefore has an equity interest in the land. The basis of this partnership between landlord and tenant is laid out in The Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. Both Landlord and Tenant are bound, profits are shared. This is unlike FBT's which are market driven and where the tenant has no equity interest in the land and no on going rights beyond the specific tenancy term. Chalk and cheese. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Tenant Farming, Subsidies, BPS & Legal Issues
AHA Rents, DFRA “Farming is Changing” and "No Deal" Brexit
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top