Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
AHDB Article: Assurance of imported grain
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="teslacoils" data-source="post: 7877360" data-attributes="member: 127792"><p>We pay a compulsory levy.....</p><p></p><p>To a company who then give a sub.....</p><p></p><p>To a company (part owned by the NFU).....</p><p></p><p>That is supposed to be voluntary, but is infact defacto mandatory.....</p><p></p><p>That we pay to be members of.....</p><p></p><p>That allows us to access the same markets that imports do without the cost. And imply we should be pleased we don't have the same regulatory burden as third countries do. </p><p></p><p>That's then kept in place by the NFU, aic, ahdb all refusing to engage with farmers. </p><p></p><p>That's the Ahdb who's stated aims are to develop access to markets and increase your efficiency. That's by a group who are attempting to "improv[e] transparency, efficiency and accountability." By the way, they're doing that by paying external consultants to engage with stakeholders. </p><p></p><p>Broken record </p><p>Broken aims</p><p>Broken ahdb</p><p></p><p>You need to wake up and smell the corporate junket free coffee. These organisations are intertwined like tentacles. They won't change from inside. When you get asked to consider their future, you should consider if they have a future.</p><p></p><p>#adhdballot</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="teslacoils, post: 7877360, member: 127792"] We pay a compulsory levy..... To a company who then give a sub..... To a company (part owned by the NFU)..... That is supposed to be voluntary, but is infact defacto mandatory..... That we pay to be members of..... That allows us to access the same markets that imports do without the cost. And imply we should be pleased we don't have the same regulatory burden as third countries do. That's then kept in place by the NFU, aic, ahdb all refusing to engage with farmers. That's the Ahdb who's stated aims are to develop access to markets and increase your efficiency. That's by a group who are attempting to "improv[e] transparency, efficiency and accountability." By the way, they're doing that by paying external consultants to engage with stakeholders. Broken record Broken aims Broken ahdb You need to wake up and smell the corporate junket free coffee. These organisations are intertwined like tentacles. They won't change from inside. When you get asked to consider their future, you should consider if they have a future. #adhdballot [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
AHDB Article: Assurance of imported grain
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top