Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
AHDB POLL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grass And Grain" data-source="post: 7473850" data-attributes="member: 23184"><p>I've a feeling the money paid to RT is ring fenced for marketing?</p><p></p><p>I think AHDB could use that cash in a way which would better help levy payers.</p><p></p><p>I'd suggest getting AIC to create a level playing field. If AIC/RT won't budge, I'd like to see AHDB set up farmer run alternatives to both RT and AIC.</p><p></p><p>Farmers purchase feed from mills, so why shouldn't we insist on a UFAS type scheme which WE approve of. The current UFAS and AIC scheme rules put extra costs on arable farmers, and that ultimately means extra cost to purchasers of the feed. It's a cost that can be stripped out of our industry, with no detriment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grass And Grain, post: 7473850, member: 23184"] I've a feeling the money paid to RT is ring fenced for marketing? I think AHDB could use that cash in a way which would better help levy payers. I'd suggest getting AIC to create a level playing field. If AIC/RT won't budge, I'd like to see AHDB set up farmer run alternatives to both RT and AIC. Farmers purchase feed from mills, so why shouldn't we insist on a UFAS type scheme which WE approve of. The current UFAS and AIC scheme rules put extra costs on arable farmers, and that ultimately means extra cost to purchasers of the feed. It's a cost that can be stripped out of our industry, with no detriment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
AHDB POLL
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top