Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Arable Farming
Cropping
Allied Mills screwing farmers over with dodgy claims?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Feldspar" data-source="post: 7162557" data-attributes="member: 386"><p>This video appeared on Twitter today: [MEDIA=twitter]1311646740769107969[/MEDIA].</p><p></p><p>If this account is accurate, this is so damaging to the trust that farmers place in the end user to act as an honest judge of the delivered produce. The problem is that they are not an impartial judge insofar as they stand to lose or benefit depending on their assessment of the sample. </p><p></p><p>The results of the mycotoxin test are outstanding, but that's really not the point. The point is they said the load had been rejected for ergot when they now accept there wasn't any ergot in it. Unless there is some credible refutation of this claim forthcoming, a reasonable conclusion is one of dishonesty. I will wait until for the fullness of time to reveal all the relevant facts, but this deeply troubles me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Feldspar, post: 7162557, member: 386"] This video appeared on Twitter today: [MEDIA=twitter]1311646740769107969[/MEDIA]. If this account is accurate, this is so damaging to the trust that farmers place in the end user to act as an honest judge of the delivered produce. The problem is that they are not an impartial judge insofar as they stand to lose or benefit depending on their assessment of the sample. The results of the mycotoxin test are outstanding, but that's really not the point. The point is they said the load had been rejected for ergot when they now accept there wasn't any ergot in it. Unless there is some credible refutation of this claim forthcoming, a reasonable conclusion is one of dishonesty. I will wait until for the fullness of time to reveal all the relevant facts, but this deeply troubles me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Arable Farming
Cropping
Allied Mills screwing farmers over with dodgy claims?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top