Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Livestock
Dairy Farming
Arla
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="farmer on a bike" data-source="post: 9255379" data-attributes="member: 295"><p>This is in no way analogous to the horrendous experience of the post masters, trying to link it is ridiculous.</p><p></p><p> Arla compete for shelf space in our customers with Nestle, Danone, Lactalis, Savencia, Mueller, Unilever, Sodiaal, Glanbia, Saputo as well as other co-ops such as RFC, DoA, Fonterra, and DMK. Putting 2 fingers up to our customers who value our scope 3 data and all follow Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) does not seem a great way to benefit our farmer owners. We work with them, we work with scientists, we get the evidence, we justify, we persuade.</p><p></p><p>I do not agree with where SBTi sits but I want to engage and get it changed, so not just Arla but all our competitors, customers and stakeholders accept the truth of the cyclicity of ruminant methane.</p><p></p><p></p><p>People make mistakes not everything is a conspiracy, in fact most things are not a conspiracy, mistakes are much more common place. The key is people own up and correct mistakes when they are pointed out, rather than cover them up which is where a conspiracy may start, and where the analogy with the Post Office/ Fujitsu reaction does make some sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="farmer on a bike, post: 9255379, member: 295"] This is in no way analogous to the horrendous experience of the post masters, trying to link it is ridiculous. Arla compete for shelf space in our customers with Nestle, Danone, Lactalis, Savencia, Mueller, Unilever, Sodiaal, Glanbia, Saputo as well as other co-ops such as RFC, DoA, Fonterra, and DMK. Putting 2 fingers up to our customers who value our scope 3 data and all follow Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) does not seem a great way to benefit our farmer owners. We work with them, we work with scientists, we get the evidence, we justify, we persuade. I do not agree with where SBTi sits but I want to engage and get it changed, so not just Arla but all our competitors, customers and stakeholders accept the truth of the cyclicity of ruminant methane. People make mistakes not everything is a conspiracy, in fact most things are not a conspiracy, mistakes are much more common place. The key is people own up and correct mistakes when they are pointed out, rather than cover them up which is where a conspiracy may start, and where the analogy with the Post Office/ Fujitsu reaction does make some sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Livestock
Dairy Farming
Arla
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top