Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Carbon Neutral vs Heat Neutral atmosphere.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ski" data-source="post: 7948610" data-attributes="member: 2207"><p>Posted before.</p><p></p><p>A new study by 3 leading physicists casting yet more doubt on anthropogenic global warming.</p><p></p><p>Two important papers have recently been published that question the extent to which humans are causing global warming by burning fossil fuel and releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The works will of course be ignored by mainstream media outlets, but they represent further evidence that a more nuanced view of human-caused or anthropogenic warming is gaining traction among scientists, tired of working within the political constraints of ‘settled’ science.</p><p></p><p>In a paper to be published next month in the journal <a href="https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/fulltext/2022/02000/world_atmospheric_co2,_its_14c_specific_activity,.2.aspx" target="_blank">Health Physics</a>, three physics professors led by Kenneth Skrable from the University of Massachusetts examine the atmospheric trail left by CO2isotopes and conclude that the amount of CO2 released by fossil fuel burning between 1750 and 2018 was “much too low to be the cause of global warming”.</p><p></p><p>Is it be to much to hope that ministers and DEFRA might take a look at the growing number of academics questioning this 'settled science' and check their environmental lunacy</p><p></p><p><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/health-physics/SocialThumb.00004032-202202000-00002.F1.jpeg" alt="journals.lww.com" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><h3><a href="https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/fulltext/2022/02000/world_atmospheric_co2,_its_14c_specific_activity,.2.aspx" target="_blank">World Atmospheric CO2, Its 14C Specific Activity,... : Health Physics</a></h3><p>1800 has been due to the anthropogenic fossil component have continued since they began in 1960 with “Keeling Curve: Increase in CO2 from burning fossil fuel.” Data and plots of annual anthropogenic fossil CO2 emissions and concentrations, C(t), published by the Energy Information...</p><p><img src="https://cdn.wolterskluwer.io/wk-logos/1.0.x/favicon.png" alt="journals.lww.com" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> journals.lww.com</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ski, post: 7948610, member: 2207"] Posted before. A new study by 3 leading physicists casting yet more doubt on anthropogenic global warming. Two important papers have recently been published that question the extent to which humans are causing global warming by burning fossil fuel and releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The works will of course be ignored by mainstream media outlets, but they represent further evidence that a more nuanced view of human-caused or anthropogenic warming is gaining traction among scientists, tired of working within the political constraints of ‘settled’ science. In a paper to be published next month in the journal [URL='https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/fulltext/2022/02000/world_atmospheric_co2,_its_14c_specific_activity,.2.aspx']Health Physics[/URL], three physics professors led by Kenneth Skrable from the University of Massachusetts examine the atmospheric trail left by CO2isotopes and conclude that the amount of CO2 released by fossil fuel burning between 1750 and 2018 was “much too low to be the cause of global warming”. Is it be to much to hope that ministers and DEFRA might take a look at the growing number of academics questioning this 'settled science' and check their environmental lunacy [IMG alt="journals.lww.com"]https://images.journals.lww.com/health-physics/SocialThumb.00004032-202202000-00002.F1.jpeg[/IMG] [HEADING=2][URL='https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/fulltext/2022/02000/world_atmospheric_co2,_its_14c_specific_activity,.2.aspx']World Atmospheric CO2, Its 14C Specific Activity,... : Health Physics[/URL][/HEADING] 1800 has been due to the anthropogenic fossil component have continued since they began in 1960 with “Keeling Curve: Increase in CO2 from burning fossil fuel.” Data and plots of annual anthropogenic fossil CO2 emissions and concentrations, C(t), published by the Energy Information... [IMG alt="journals.lww.com"]https://cdn.wolterskluwer.io/wk-logos/1.0.x/favicon.png[/IMG] journals.lww.com [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Carbon Neutral vs Heat Neutral atmosphere.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top