Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Committee on Climate Change Report The Future For Farming And Land Use
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gone up the hill" data-source="post: 6740154" data-attributes="member: 1048"><p>TBH I think that its Minette who is driving this climate change rubbish and pushing for farms to reduce livestock/ plant trees and be carbon zero by 2040! </p><p></p><p>Clear why see is doing it as like RT ( which she has pushed so hard onto the industry ) is a cushy high paying role on some company board that audits farms for carbon usage/ lock up etc.</p><p></p><p>Who the hell in their right mind would support something that will destroy their members assets like land if they are forced to grow trees with subs only covering the growing costs for the first 10/15 years at best and then you will get no income from that land for another 40/50+ years:?? she lives in cloud cuckoo land!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gone up the hill, post: 6740154, member: 1048"] TBH I think that its Minette who is driving this climate change rubbish and pushing for farms to reduce livestock/ plant trees and be carbon zero by 2040! Clear why see is doing it as like RT ( which she has pushed so hard onto the industry ) is a cushy high paying role on some company board that audits farms for carbon usage/ lock up etc. Who the hell in their right mind would support something that will destroy their members assets like land if they are forced to grow trees with subs only covering the growing costs for the first 10/15 years at best and then you will get no income from that land for another 40/50+ years:?? she lives in cloud cuckoo land! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Committee on Climate Change Report The Future For Farming And Land Use
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top