Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Tenant Farming, Subsidies, BPS & Legal Issues
DEFRA consultation on Local Nature Recovery plans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delilah" data-source="post: 7800886" data-attributes="member: 76758"><p>Having had a bollocking from Defra for sending my suggestions to the ELMS Engagement Group, and then asking them why this was a problem, I had the below reply. Clear as mud. They seem to be obsessing over managing the process of co-design, when they should be focused on taking on board any and all suggestions however they may be submitted. If I was on the ELMS Engagement Group I would be asking myself if it was any more than a box ticking exercise. </p><p></p><p></p><p><em>Thank you for your email and apologies for the delay in response. You are, of course, very welcome to contact any organisation of which you belong to, or represent, with your ideas for future farming policies. However, we would very much like to make sure those ideas get to the right policy team here in Defra, who are able to properly consider them. So we would like to politely ask that instead of using the Environmental Land Management Engagement group (EEG) circulation list, you instead send any thoughts you have on our environmental schemes directly to <a href="mailto:ELMStakeholder@defra.gov.uk">ELMStakeholder@defra.gov.uk</a> so we can ensure they get to the right place.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>The Environmental Land Management Engagement group (EEG) is our core stakeholder group helping us to co-design aspects of our new environmental schemes. This wide-ranging group represent a whole raft of different sectors, so we ideally only want information going to all of them when it is relevant for all sectors to be aware of. We use thoughts and feedback from this external group as one of the many routes to help us design our Policy.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>I hope this has cleared up any confusion caused, and look forward to helping you share your ideas with our policy teams here in Defra.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delilah, post: 7800886, member: 76758"] Having had a bollocking from Defra for sending my suggestions to the ELMS Engagement Group, and then asking them why this was a problem, I had the below reply. Clear as mud. They seem to be obsessing over managing the process of co-design, when they should be focused on taking on board any and all suggestions however they may be submitted. If I was on the ELMS Engagement Group I would be asking myself if it was any more than a box ticking exercise. [I]Thank you for your email and apologies for the delay in response. You are, of course, very welcome to contact any organisation of which you belong to, or represent, with your ideas for future farming policies. However, we would very much like to make sure those ideas get to the right policy team here in Defra, who are able to properly consider them. So we would like to politely ask that instead of using the Environmental Land Management Engagement group (EEG) circulation list, you instead send any thoughts you have on our environmental schemes directly to [email]ELMStakeholder@defra.gov.uk[/email] so we can ensure they get to the right place. The Environmental Land Management Engagement group (EEG) is our core stakeholder group helping us to co-design aspects of our new environmental schemes. This wide-ranging group represent a whole raft of different sectors, so we ideally only want information going to all of them when it is relevant for all sectors to be aware of. We use thoughts and feedback from this external group as one of the many routes to help us design our Policy. I hope this has cleared up any confusion caused, and look forward to helping you share your ideas with our policy teams here in Defra.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Tenant Farming, Subsidies, BPS & Legal Issues
DEFRA consultation on Local Nature Recovery plans
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top