Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Tenant Farming, Subsidies, BPS & Legal Issues
DEFRA consultation on Local Nature Recovery plans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="steveR" data-source="post: 7802425" data-attributes="member: 66976"><p>I liked this comment mind...</p><p></p><p></p><p><em>"Encouragingly, most of the Breckland group members said that this mapping tool was useful for them, and they were more likely to engage with coordinated landscape-scale conservation as a result of this test and trial. However, maps alone are only part of the solution. </em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>For <strong>many of them</strong>, the crucial detail is the payment rates they will get for delivering options in schemes like this.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><strong>On some farms,</strong> if those payments aren't competitive, the conservation work is unlikely to go ahead. This would prevent our blueprint from turning into a reality. "</em></p><p></p><p>I would hazard that the above should read <strong>All Farms </strong>and<strong> Most of them?</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p>I guess the Million Pound question, is who has pushed for the Higher Tier elements of ELMS, and why?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="steveR, post: 7802425, member: 66976"] I liked this comment mind... [I]"Encouragingly, most of the Breckland group members said that this mapping tool was useful for them, and they were more likely to engage with coordinated landscape-scale conservation as a result of this test and trial. However, maps alone are only part of the solution. For [B]many of them[/B], the crucial detail is the payment rates they will get for delivering options in schemes like this. [B]On some farms,[/B] if those payments aren't competitive, the conservation work is unlikely to go ahead. This would prevent our blueprint from turning into a reality. "[/I] I would hazard that the above should read [B]All Farms [/B]and[B] Most of them?[/B] I guess the Million Pound question, is who has pushed for the Higher Tier elements of ELMS, and why? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Tenant Farming, Subsidies, BPS & Legal Issues
DEFRA consultation on Local Nature Recovery plans
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top