Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Arable Farming
Cropping
Direct Driller lime article
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cab-over Pete" data-source="post: 7916687" data-attributes="member: 416"><p>That the person writing the original article has stated 100% of the bulk lime sampled BY HIMSELF in the U.K. fails to meet regulations whilst giving no independent proof of such a claim is not my opinion. It has been stated by the author himself.</p><p></p><p>It is my opinion that his claims are bulls**t and until he gives the readers full and independent proof of his claims then that will remain the case. He will never be able to provide that proof because his claim is wrong. Independent sampling goes on all the time for these products and if failings are found the producer cannot sell their product. THAT is fact. </p><p></p><p>He has made these claims before and never provided any proof. Nor will he ever be able to. If some “proof” as he sees it ever emerges then every lime supplier in the country who meets the stringent regulations of The Fertiliser Act will be able to counter his claims with independent sample results carried out on their products. </p><p></p><p>Saying that you have sampled lime yourself and found 100% to fail regulations whilst not being an accredited laboratory is not fact. It is nothing but hearsay. For all we know he could have sampled from only one quarry and found it fails by 1% </p><p></p><p>So in summary, no it is not my opinion that his claims are unsubstantiated or proven. That is fact.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cab-over Pete, post: 7916687, member: 416"] That the person writing the original article has stated 100% of the bulk lime sampled BY HIMSELF in the U.K. fails to meet regulations whilst giving no independent proof of such a claim is not my opinion. It has been stated by the author himself. It is my opinion that his claims are bulls**t and until he gives the readers full and independent proof of his claims then that will remain the case. He will never be able to provide that proof because his claim is wrong. Independent sampling goes on all the time for these products and if failings are found the producer cannot sell their product. THAT is fact. He has made these claims before and never provided any proof. Nor will he ever be able to. If some “proof” as he sees it ever emerges then every lime supplier in the country who meets the stringent regulations of The Fertiliser Act will be able to counter his claims with independent sample results carried out on their products. Saying that you have sampled lime yourself and found 100% to fail regulations whilst not being an accredited laboratory is not fact. It is nothing but hearsay. For all we know he could have sampled from only one quarry and found it fails by 1% So in summary, no it is not my opinion that his claims are unsubstantiated or proven. That is fact. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Arable Farming
Cropping
Direct Driller lime article
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top