Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Politics, Covid19 and Brexit
Environmental common sense at last
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Danllan" data-source="post: 7749771" data-attributes="member: 8735"><p>Are you taking the p!ss? Read up on infra red attenuation, absorption and re-emission and then come back to the grown-up discussion. </p><p></p><p>In this, as with most things in life, it is best not to settle one's conclusion before establishing and understanding the facts of the matter. Anyone with an objective and empirical bent can just look at the ice core records (going back over 800ka now) and note the <u>exact</u> correlation between atmospheric CO2 and change; equally, anyone with a preset agenda can ignore demonstrable scientific fact entirely...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Hmm, plankton, just a wee bit important in the scheme of things; have a think about that... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite24" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs Up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>He may be disputing that too, but my understanding of his '<em>argument</em>' in this thread is that CO2 is being wholly overplayed as a factor in global warming / climate change. </p><p></p><p>Well, I think it there is a fair amount of evidence available now to bear out anyone claiming that its influence was initially overstated. It <u>was</u> the headline-grabber, and there can be no doubt that if anyone on the street is asked about climate change factors, CO2 will probably be the first thing they mention. But now others, notably clathrates, are beginning to be publicly recognised, at last.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Danllan, post: 7749771, member: 8735"] Are you taking the p!ss? Read up on infra red attenuation, absorption and re-emission and then come back to the grown-up discussion. In this, as with most things in life, it is best not to settle one's conclusion before establishing and understanding the facts of the matter. Anyone with an objective and empirical bent can just look at the ice core records (going back over 800ka now) and note the [U]exact[/U] correlation between atmospheric CO2 and change; equally, anyone with a preset agenda can ignore demonstrable scientific fact entirely... Hmm, plankton, just a wee bit important in the scheme of things; have a think about that... (y) He may be disputing that too, but my understanding of his '[I]argument[/I]' in this thread is that CO2 is being wholly overplayed as a factor in global warming / climate change. Well, I think it there is a fair amount of evidence available now to bear out anyone claiming that its influence was initially overstated. It [U]was[/U] the headline-grabber, and there can be no doubt that if anyone on the street is asked about climate change factors, CO2 will probably be the first thing they mention. But now others, notably clathrates, are beginning to be publicly recognised, at last. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Politics, Covid19 and Brexit
Environmental common sense at last
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top