Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Global warming, an alternative view
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="C.J" data-source="post: 7708671" data-attributes="member: 1080"><p>Yes water vapour is the biggest cause of the green house effect and the planet would be 33 degrees cooler without it.</p><p></p><p>The above article attributes 25 of the 33 degrees to water vapour so about 76 % .</p><p></p><p>NASA use the figure of 75% but they do like to ignore clouds and water vapour and only talk about greenhouse gases.</p><p></p><p>However NASA (Gavin Schmidt of the Goddard Institute) have now realised that the computer climate models are running too hot - they have overestimated the warming due to CO2 and underestimated natural causes.</p><p></p><p>So it is very likely that water vapour is responsible for more than 75% - this diagram suggests 95%</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]980361[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="C.J, post: 7708671, member: 1080"] Yes water vapour is the biggest cause of the green house effect and the planet would be 33 degrees cooler without it. The above article attributes 25 of the 33 degrees to water vapour so about 76 % . NASA use the figure of 75% but they do like to ignore clouds and water vapour and only talk about greenhouse gases. However NASA (Gavin Schmidt of the Goddard Institute) have now realised that the computer climate models are running too hot - they have overestimated the warming due to CO2 and underestimated natural causes. So it is very likely that water vapour is responsible for more than 75% - this diagram suggests 95% [ATTACH type="full"]980361[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Global warming, an alternative view
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top