Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Heated conversation about floodwater
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Danllan" data-source="post: 9110353" data-attributes="member: 8735"><p>Ha! I don't call for the destruction of all badgers, the very thought of their being extinct is horrible for me. I have no problem with animals causing a problem being culled, or other mitigating actions being taken.</p><p></p><p>My advocating for beavers is, as with other so-called '<em>rewilding</em>', for where it is safe and practicable. I don't suggest they should be everywhere, but there are plenty of places where they will do nothing to inconvenience anyone.</p><p></p><p>And, of course, we all think that we should be able to do pretty much what we want on our own lands, if a group of contiguous landowners on a water course want to have beavers, why shouldn't they? They aren't forcing others to have them, and any 'inconvenience' and loss on them...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Danllan, post: 9110353, member: 8735"] Ha! I don't call for the destruction of all badgers, the very thought of their being extinct is horrible for me. I have no problem with animals causing a problem being culled, or other mitigating actions being taken. My advocating for beavers is, as with other so-called '[I]rewilding[/I]', for where it is safe and practicable. I don't suggest they should be everywhere, but there are plenty of places where they will do nothing to inconvenience anyone. And, of course, we all think that we should be able to do pretty much what we want on our own lands, if a group of contiguous landowners on a water course want to have beavers, why shouldn't they? They aren't forcing others to have them, and any 'inconvenience' and loss on them... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Heated conversation about floodwater
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top