Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Ivermectin , covid cure
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cowabunga" data-source="post: 7727870" data-attributes="member: 718"><p>Buy it or not. Explain then why the WHO and Dr Fauci in the USA are so against it. It has an impeccable safety record over 40 years and 4thousand million human doses, so it does no harm. Yet there is plenty of evidence that is ignored by these people that it has at least some effect as an anti-viral and anti-infammatory. More evidence indeed than some of the chemicals that they have approved and use. They just aren't sitting on the wall about this. They are dead against it. Why?</p><p>The evidence from India alone is that it works on a grand scale, yet its use has been blatantly ignored by the WHO report. Why? Someone is pulling strings. They don't and can't point to any significant trials where it doesn't work apart from a very few where the trials were fairly obviously designed for it to fail, and there aren't even many of those.</p><p></p><p>Let's be clear here. I'm not claiming any degree of efficacy for ivermectin. I just know that the clinicians who do use it claim that it works. They have no incentive for doing so other than to save lives. The WHO is certainly influenced by politics and you can be absolutely sure that the large pharmaceutical companies are lobbying politicians and doctors, as they always do, for the use of their products and for the non-use of rival products. That is what big business does and often does very well. Often to the extent that they use illegal means. Don't be naive enough to think that they don't. It has been proven time and again that they are not to be trusted. An example is Johnson and Johnson, the maker of one of the main vaccines for Covid, that will almost certainly be made bankrupt in the next few months to avoid paying damages to people that have had cancer as a result of using their talcum powder which the company knew decades ago was contaminated with asbestos.</p><p></p><p>It goes deeper, and shallower than that. My own doctor and his wife freely admits that his annual holidays to really exotic destinations have been paid for by a number of pharmaceutical companies for prescribing a target amount of certain of their drugs. He would say that he would have prescribed them anyway. Of course he would say that, but I can bet anything you like that the holidays were an incentive or they would never have been offered in the first place. They are disguised as 'study tours' or educational conferences.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cowabunga, post: 7727870, member: 718"] Buy it or not. Explain then why the WHO and Dr Fauci in the USA are so against it. It has an impeccable safety record over 40 years and 4thousand million human doses, so it does no harm. Yet there is plenty of evidence that is ignored by these people that it has at least some effect as an anti-viral and anti-infammatory. More evidence indeed than some of the chemicals that they have approved and use. They just aren't sitting on the wall about this. They are dead against it. Why? The evidence from India alone is that it works on a grand scale, yet its use has been blatantly ignored by the WHO report. Why? Someone is pulling strings. They don't and can't point to any significant trials where it doesn't work apart from a very few where the trials were fairly obviously designed for it to fail, and there aren't even many of those. Let's be clear here. I'm not claiming any degree of efficacy for ivermectin. I just know that the clinicians who do use it claim that it works. They have no incentive for doing so other than to save lives. The WHO is certainly influenced by politics and you can be absolutely sure that the large pharmaceutical companies are lobbying politicians and doctors, as they always do, for the use of their products and for the non-use of rival products. That is what big business does and often does very well. Often to the extent that they use illegal means. Don't be naive enough to think that they don't. It has been proven time and again that they are not to be trusted. An example is Johnson and Johnson, the maker of one of the main vaccines for Covid, that will almost certainly be made bankrupt in the next few months to avoid paying damages to people that have had cancer as a result of using their talcum powder which the company knew decades ago was contaminated with asbestos. It goes deeper, and shallower than that. My own doctor and his wife freely admits that his annual holidays to really exotic destinations have been paid for by a number of pharmaceutical companies for prescribing a target amount of certain of their drugs. He would say that he would have prescribed them anyway. Of course he would say that, but I can bet anything you like that the holidays were an incentive or they would never have been offered in the first place. They are disguised as 'study tours' or educational conferences. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Ivermectin , covid cure
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top