Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Ivermectin , covid cure
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cowabunga" data-source="post: 7872118" data-attributes="member: 718"><p>Where was the evidence that the vaccines actually worked until it was proven that they didn’t work anything like as well as expected, didn’t last as long and had far more serious adverse events than first thought? The evidence is often not in big trials but comes from experience during use, which is where the evidence for Ivermectin’s efficacy, or not, comes from. Not from big official trials, of which there has only been one, very recently completed and designed to fail. Nobody in the pharmacological industry wants a hint of it succeeding for reasons that have been illustrated many many times. They will not trial it, will cast doubt on its safety and demonise it in every way possible. This reached a crescendo a few months ago with a coordinated media storm that was demonstrably full of blatant lies, such as that US hospitals were full of overdosed Ivermectin patients and that some were shedding their guts. This was from a doctor that had not worked at a hospital for some time and which hospital authorities denied absolutely, stating categorically that they had not had a single such patient or even one with any side effect whatsoever. Not a single Ivermectin-related patient. </p><p>Not even the chap in the video YOU provided, probably without watching it, because you never do according to yourself, cast the slightest doubt on its safety. He did cast doubt on its efficacy though, but from some equally theoretical computer generated studies of a similar kind that others postulate as to how it actually works. </p><p></p><p>Experience on the ground in India, South America, Africa and now Japan seems to indicate that it does work. At the very least we can say that it does no harm and costs next to bugger-all. Those that think it is an alternative to vaccination and social distancing are the fools. I’m sure that both Pfizer and Merck will emphasise that their new products are an adjunct to vaccines for <strong>early </strong>intervention, not alternatives. That is where the Oxford trial went wrong, likely not by accident. I can bet you a fiver that no such ‘mistake’ will be done when it comes to these two novel new patented products. If the Oxford trial had been conducted appropriately and came up with the same result, fair enough. But everyone with an ounce of sense knew it wasn’t being conducted appropriately and I said so as soon as it was announced and described and am sticking to that view. It’s most unfortunate because it only persuades people like you, who just cannot think outside the box and look at the bigger picture.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cowabunga, post: 7872118, member: 718"] Where was the evidence that the vaccines actually worked until it was proven that they didn’t work anything like as well as expected, didn’t last as long and had far more serious adverse events than first thought? The evidence is often not in big trials but comes from experience during use, which is where the evidence for Ivermectin’s efficacy, or not, comes from. Not from big official trials, of which there has only been one, very recently completed and designed to fail. Nobody in the pharmacological industry wants a hint of it succeeding for reasons that have been illustrated many many times. They will not trial it, will cast doubt on its safety and demonise it in every way possible. This reached a crescendo a few months ago with a coordinated media storm that was demonstrably full of blatant lies, such as that US hospitals were full of overdosed Ivermectin patients and that some were shedding their guts. This was from a doctor that had not worked at a hospital for some time and which hospital authorities denied absolutely, stating categorically that they had not had a single such patient or even one with any side effect whatsoever. Not a single Ivermectin-related patient. Not even the chap in the video YOU provided, probably without watching it, because you never do according to yourself, cast the slightest doubt on its safety. He did cast doubt on its efficacy though, but from some equally theoretical computer generated studies of a similar kind that others postulate as to how it actually works. Experience on the ground in India, South America, Africa and now Japan seems to indicate that it does work. At the very least we can say that it does no harm and costs next to bugger-all. Those that think it is an alternative to vaccination and social distancing are the fools. I’m sure that both Pfizer and Merck will emphasise that their new products are an adjunct to vaccines for [B]early [/B]intervention, not alternatives. That is where the Oxford trial went wrong, likely not by accident. I can bet you a fiver that no such ‘mistake’ will be done when it comes to these two novel new patented products. If the Oxford trial had been conducted appropriately and came up with the same result, fair enough. But everyone with an ounce of sense knew it wasn’t being conducted appropriately and I said so as soon as it was announced and described and am sticking to that view. It’s most unfortunate because it only persuades people like you, who just cannot think outside the box and look at the bigger picture. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Ivermectin , covid cure
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top