Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Ivermectin , covid cure
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ollie989898" data-source="post: 7873585" data-attributes="member: 54866"><p>The vaccines when through the testing process. I don't think you understand the terminology of an emergency approval. I believe you will see elsewhere on this thread where I mentioned that they did a phase 3 trial of over 40,000 participants. If you wish I can trawl the web and provide references for these.</p><p></p><p>So you have no actual evidence that vaccines 'don't work' or last as long as expected, you're just going on what the government intend to do. Ok. Glad we cleared that up.</p><p></p><p>Adverse events- ok, so what do you classify as an adverse event? And tell us please, how many deaths have their been attributed to the vaccine, I'm genuinely interested to know.</p><p></p><p>Doctors are not at liberty to prescribe or do whatever they please, I don't know where you formed that belief from. As I keep telling you, if a drug isn't accepted by the MHRA it won't even be available to buy in the UK legally, much less prescribe it. And doctors would be expected to work within NICE guidelines and the usual cascade or else have very good reasons to go outside of these. Whilst this is perfectly acceptable practice and doctors would have some leeway within the guidelines, their actions would eventually be scrutinised by others so doctors in the UK don't just 'try out' something they read about on the web. To do this would mean formulating an actual trial and there are strict rules in place governing how these are performed. And guess how MHRA and NICE arrive at their guidelines? That's right, they use an available evidence base. If you don't believe me then you can check out the recent legal case brought against a top oncologist who was way off the reservation in the treatment he was giving his patients.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ollie989898, post: 7873585, member: 54866"] The vaccines when through the testing process. I don't think you understand the terminology of an emergency approval. I believe you will see elsewhere on this thread where I mentioned that they did a phase 3 trial of over 40,000 participants. If you wish I can trawl the web and provide references for these. So you have no actual evidence that vaccines 'don't work' or last as long as expected, you're just going on what the government intend to do. Ok. Glad we cleared that up. Adverse events- ok, so what do you classify as an adverse event? And tell us please, how many deaths have their been attributed to the vaccine, I'm genuinely interested to know. Doctors are not at liberty to prescribe or do whatever they please, I don't know where you formed that belief from. As I keep telling you, if a drug isn't accepted by the MHRA it won't even be available to buy in the UK legally, much less prescribe it. And doctors would be expected to work within NICE guidelines and the usual cascade or else have very good reasons to go outside of these. Whilst this is perfectly acceptable practice and doctors would have some leeway within the guidelines, their actions would eventually be scrutinised by others so doctors in the UK don't just 'try out' something they read about on the web. To do this would mean formulating an actual trial and there are strict rules in place governing how these are performed. And guess how MHRA and NICE arrive at their guidelines? That's right, they use an available evidence base. If you don't believe me then you can check out the recent legal case brought against a top oncologist who was way off the reservation in the treatment he was giving his patients. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Ivermectin , covid cure
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top