Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
National Food Strategy: open letter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris F" data-source="post: 7675634" data-attributes="member: 5328"><p>July 2021</p><p></p><p>Rt Hon George Eustice</p><p>Seacole Building</p><p>2 Marsham St</p><p>London SW1P 4DF</p><p></p><p>Dear Secretary of State,</p><p></p><p><strong>Re: National Food Strategy: open letter</strong></p><p></p><p>We are writing to you reflecting widely different experiences and communities within the farming sector, to endorse the recommendations of the National Food Strategy proposed by Henry Dimbleby.</p><p></p><p>There are some you would expect us to support. Dimbleby is forthright about the Government’s duty to protect British farming standards and suggests a practical mechanism to do so. He is clear about the need – in the public’s interest – to ring-fence the current budget for agriculture and the environment. He rightly says that Government should be explicit about the amount of land that is needed for woodland and nature restoration, and the best places for this. He says we can achieve the changes that are needed while protecting the rights and interests of all farmers, including tenants and commoners while supporting rural communities. We are glad to see him get behind your Department’s welcome plans to back practical innovation by farmers, as the driving force in regenerative, nature-friendly agriculture.</p><p></p><p>He also recommends measures that will, gradually but not insignificantly, rebalance our nation’s food culture and markets, reducing the demand for cheap, high-calorie junk food, and boosting it for fresh, high-quality produce with provenance. This can only help British farming and drive the sector’s ambition and capacity to play our full role in reversing biodiversity loss, mitigating and adapting to climate change while producing plentiful, healthy food.</p><p></p><p>Yet there are also recommendations that might make less comfortable reading for us, but which nevertheless deserve our firm backing. They are of course about eating less meat. This is such a sensitive issue, especially when UK livestock farmers are already committed to high welfare and reducing climate impacts. But as anyone who has looked seriously at the numbers knows – even those among us who champion reintroducing sheep and cattle into rotations – the reality is that people in developed countries do need to eat less meat overall, while ensuring that the meat we do eat comes from high welfare systems that support biodiversity, which the UK is well placed to achieve. The switch from industrially produced animal products, often destined for ultra-processed foods and relying on imported proteins that can drive deforestation and land use change, to regenerative systems where animals play their time-honoured role in building soil fertility and sustaining nature must happen swiftly. </p><p></p><p>The debate in farming should not be about whether this is so, but about how to make this transformation quickly and fairly, for both farmers and citizens, avoiding unintended consequences, and with the best results for the climate, nature and animal welfare, both in the UK and globally. We welcome the clarity and nuance that Dimbleby has brought to the debate and the lengths he has gone to find ways of achieving this. Specifically, his proposals that schools and hospitals should serve less but better meat, more and better fresh produce; and that the biggest businesses should show leadership by reporting what they sell, and how it is produced; are prudent first steps.</p><p></p><p>We urge you to give this report your deepest consideration, and to facilitate a positive government response rapidly. The wellbeing of future generations, and the ability of the NHS to care for society, depends on the leadership your government shows in this fundamentally important space.</p><p></p><p>Yours sincerely,</p><p></p><p><strong>Julia Aglionby</strong></p><p>Trustee, Susan’s Farm and Executive Director, Foundation for Common Land</p><p></p><p><strong>Helen Browning</strong></p><p>Farmer and Chief Executive of the Soil Association</p><p></p><p><strong>Caroline Drummond</strong></p><p>Chief Executive, LEAF</p><p></p><p><strong>Jake Fiennes</strong></p><p> Director of Conservation, Holkham Estate</p><p></p><p><strong>Peter and Henrietta Greig</strong></p><p>Pipers Farm</p><p></p><p><strong>William Kendall</strong></p><p>Farmer and entrepreneur</p><p></p><p><strong>Alastair Leake</strong></p><p>Director of Policy, The Game & Wildlife Trust</p><p></p><p><strong>Martin Lines</strong></p><p>Arable farmer and UK Chair of the Nature Friendly Farming Network</p><p></p><p><strong>Sue Pritchard</strong></p><p>Farmer and Chief Executive, The Food, Farming and Countryside Commission</p><p></p><p><strong>John Shropshire</strong></p><p>Chairman G’s Group</p><p></p><p><strong>Craig Livingstone</strong></p><p>Lockerley Estate</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris F, post: 7675634, member: 5328"] July 2021 Rt Hon George Eustice Seacole Building 2 Marsham St London SW1P 4DF Dear Secretary of State, [B]Re: National Food Strategy: open letter[/B] We are writing to you reflecting widely different experiences and communities within the farming sector, to endorse the recommendations of the National Food Strategy proposed by Henry Dimbleby. There are some you would expect us to support. Dimbleby is forthright about the Government’s duty to protect British farming standards and suggests a practical mechanism to do so. He is clear about the need – in the public’s interest – to ring-fence the current budget for agriculture and the environment. He rightly says that Government should be explicit about the amount of land that is needed for woodland and nature restoration, and the best places for this. He says we can achieve the changes that are needed while protecting the rights and interests of all farmers, including tenants and commoners while supporting rural communities. We are glad to see him get behind your Department’s welcome plans to back practical innovation by farmers, as the driving force in regenerative, nature-friendly agriculture. He also recommends measures that will, gradually but not insignificantly, rebalance our nation’s food culture and markets, reducing the demand for cheap, high-calorie junk food, and boosting it for fresh, high-quality produce with provenance. This can only help British farming and drive the sector’s ambition and capacity to play our full role in reversing biodiversity loss, mitigating and adapting to climate change while producing plentiful, healthy food. Yet there are also recommendations that might make less comfortable reading for us, but which nevertheless deserve our firm backing. They are of course about eating less meat. This is such a sensitive issue, especially when UK livestock farmers are already committed to high welfare and reducing climate impacts. But as anyone who has looked seriously at the numbers knows – even those among us who champion reintroducing sheep and cattle into rotations – the reality is that people in developed countries do need to eat less meat overall, while ensuring that the meat we do eat comes from high welfare systems that support biodiversity, which the UK is well placed to achieve. The switch from industrially produced animal products, often destined for ultra-processed foods and relying on imported proteins that can drive deforestation and land use change, to regenerative systems where animals play their time-honoured role in building soil fertility and sustaining nature must happen swiftly. The debate in farming should not be about whether this is so, but about how to make this transformation quickly and fairly, for both farmers and citizens, avoiding unintended consequences, and with the best results for the climate, nature and animal welfare, both in the UK and globally. We welcome the clarity and nuance that Dimbleby has brought to the debate and the lengths he has gone to find ways of achieving this. Specifically, his proposals that schools and hospitals should serve less but better meat, more and better fresh produce; and that the biggest businesses should show leadership by reporting what they sell, and how it is produced; are prudent first steps. We urge you to give this report your deepest consideration, and to facilitate a positive government response rapidly. The wellbeing of future generations, and the ability of the NHS to care for society, depends on the leadership your government shows in this fundamentally important space. Yours sincerely, [B]Julia Aglionby[/B] Trustee, Susan’s Farm and Executive Director, Foundation for Common Land [B]Helen Browning[/B] Farmer and Chief Executive of the Soil Association [B]Caroline Drummond[/B] Chief Executive, LEAF [B]Jake Fiennes[/B] Director of Conservation, Holkham Estate [B]Peter and Henrietta Greig[/B] Pipers Farm [B]William Kendall[/B] Farmer and entrepreneur [B]Alastair Leake[/B] Director of Policy, The Game & Wildlife Trust [B]Martin Lines[/B] Arable farmer and UK Chair of the Nature Friendly Farming Network [B]Sue Pritchard[/B] Farmer and Chief Executive, The Food, Farming and Countryside Commission [B]John Shropshire[/B] Chairman G’s Group [B]Craig Livingstone[/B] Lockerley Estate [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
National Food Strategy: open letter
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top