Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Tenant Farming, Subsidies, BPS & Legal Issues
Natural England knows best?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jackov Altraids" data-source="post: 7622150" data-attributes="member: 3566"><p>I don't know any more than what I've read here but that looks like a stitch up to me.</p><p></p><p>First of all, it says it is 'thought' to have protected iron age remains. It was not designated as other local known sites were, so may not have had more iron age remains than any other field in the country. They must have felt this was less than credible to include that "The land was also said to have historical significance as a training area used by American troops before D-Day with old trenches also at risk of being lost."</p><p>ajcc always said that he could easily be found to be guilty of a 'stop notice' but had no way of challenging that the 'stop notice' was entirely invalid.</p><p></p><p>I think everyone should be extremely concerned at how NE, The National Trust and the judicial system has connived to persecute, prosecute and penalise a farmer for farming in the same manner as he had for 30 years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jackov Altraids, post: 7622150, member: 3566"] I don't know any more than what I've read here but that looks like a stitch up to me. First of all, it says it is 'thought' to have protected iron age remains. It was not designated as other local known sites were, so may not have had more iron age remains than any other field in the country. They must have felt this was less than credible to include that "The land was also said to have historical significance as a training area used by American troops before D-Day with old trenches also at risk of being lost." ajcc always said that he could easily be found to be guilty of a 'stop notice' but had no way of challenging that the 'stop notice' was entirely invalid. I think everyone should be extremely concerned at how NE, The National Trust and the judicial system has connived to persecute, prosecute and penalise a farmer for farming in the same manner as he had for 30 years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Tenant Farming, Subsidies, BPS & Legal Issues
Natural England knows best?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top