Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Net Zero
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DaveGrohl" data-source="post: 7457824" data-attributes="member: 3563"><p>I didn't say it was negligible, just that it balanced the manufacturing carbon inside a year. There isn't an actual answer to all of this though, the best we can do is try to minimise. And of course, even if the human race stopped emitting carbon today warming will continue because of what's happened already.</p><p>Edit: I couldn't even swear if the "inside a year" was solely the carbon involved in the construction of a turbine or if it was also adding in the carbon saved by not burning fossil fuels over a number of years. I'm fairly sure it's just the manufacturing carbon though but please feel free to do your own.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DaveGrohl, post: 7457824, member: 3563"] I didn't say it was negligible, just that it balanced the manufacturing carbon inside a year. There isn't an actual answer to all of this though, the best we can do is try to minimise. And of course, even if the human race stopped emitting carbon today warming will continue because of what's happened already. Edit: I couldn't even swear if the "inside a year" was solely the carbon involved in the construction of a turbine or if it was also adding in the carbon saved by not burning fossil fuels over a number of years. I'm fairly sure it's just the manufacturing carbon though but please feel free to do your own. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Net Zero
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top