Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
New information about local nature recovery and landscape recovery
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DrWazzock" data-source="post: 7958046" data-attributes="member: 2119"><p>Precisely.</p><p>The existing system, (BPS and CS) isn’t even fully bedded in and and working yet, but they see fit to move on to a new system. Why? The present system provides every mechanism needed to achieve either direct area based support or payment for environmental work. All they needs to be done is to turn the dials up or down a bit. But leave the mechanisms as they are?</p><p>So what will LR and LNR bring to the party? LNR is just CS with a different name. The only thing I can see that is really new is LR. This will rely on multi land holder cooperation and agreements for which there is absolutely no mechanism in place and which will struggle to work at all when it gets to stage where legally binding contracts have to drawn up. It will be a mess and a minefield. I don’t think it’s been thought through.</p><p>We never learn. Wholesale change is extremely inefficient and expensive. Sweat the system that’s already in place. Get a return from those assets. Continues to smooth them out. But don’t bring in more change if you can possibly avoid it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DrWazzock, post: 7958046, member: 2119"] Precisely. The existing system, (BPS and CS) isn’t even fully bedded in and and working yet, but they see fit to move on to a new system. Why? The present system provides every mechanism needed to achieve either direct area based support or payment for environmental work. All they needs to be done is to turn the dials up or down a bit. But leave the mechanisms as they are? So what will LR and LNR bring to the party? LNR is just CS with a different name. The only thing I can see that is really new is LR. This will rely on multi land holder cooperation and agreements for which there is absolutely no mechanism in place and which will struggle to work at all when it gets to stage where legally binding contracts have to drawn up. It will be a mess and a minefield. I don’t think it’s been thought through. We never learn. Wholesale change is extremely inefficient and expensive. Sweat the system that’s already in place. Get a return from those assets. Continues to smooth them out. But don’t bring in more change if you can possibly avoid it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
New information about local nature recovery and landscape recovery
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top