Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
New information about local nature recovery and landscape recovery
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jackov Altraids" data-source="post: 7959286" data-attributes="member: 3566"><p>64 pages into this thread and what seems to becoming obvious is that SFI/LR/LNR in its current guise will have a net negative effect on the environment.</p><p></p><p>This is because it is clear that the money will be given to those who have planned to do environmental things anyway. Whether they are a charity with responsibilities in that regard anyway, private estates that want the kudos/ extra cover for shooting or large corporations that were planting trees to offset their carbon[a joke in itself].</p><p></p><p>By choosing to reduce support for all marginal land which has always been such a rich and diverse habitat, it is very likely that this will be farmed much more intensively.</p><p></p><p>A failing scheme is bad, one that uses huge resources to make things worse is diabolical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jackov Altraids, post: 7959286, member: 3566"] 64 pages into this thread and what seems to becoming obvious is that SFI/LR/LNR in its current guise will have a net negative effect on the environment. This is because it is clear that the money will be given to those who have planned to do environmental things anyway. Whether they are a charity with responsibilities in that regard anyway, private estates that want the kudos/ extra cover for shooting or large corporations that were planting trees to offset their carbon[a joke in itself]. By choosing to reduce support for all marginal land which has always been such a rich and diverse habitat, it is very likely that this will be farmed much more intensively. A failing scheme is bad, one that uses huge resources to make things worse is diabolical. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
New information about local nature recovery and landscape recovery
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top