Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Regenerative Agriculture and Direct Drilling
Regen Ag General Discussion
No-till versus ploughing -- does increased stratification help?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Feldspar" data-source="post: 3407730" data-attributes="member: 386"><p>So this question has been bugging me for a while. I keep hearing recently, and I think I am correct that [USER=801]@martian[/USER] is a proponent of this approach, that no-till is a vital way of sequestering carbon in the efforts to combat elevated atmospheric concentrations. Moreover, and perhaps more relevant to farming in the shorter term, is the claim that this extra SOC will dramatically improve the fertility (and therefore the productivity) of our soils.</p><p></p><p>There is only one problem with this, I think there's a good chance that no-till doesn't actually do the above. To get a really overview of the corpus of academic work on this area pretty much requires this to be your job, but having done a good few hours -- probably tens of hours -- reading around this subject, I come somewhat begrudgingly to hold this viewpoint.</p><p></p><p>There is a lot of erroneous information about SOM / SOC etc under plough and no-till systems. A lot of the errors come from incorrect sampling techniques. For example, sampling too shallowly and failing to correct for bulk density in the samples. Once those mistakes are corrected, the general picture shows surprisingly little difference between tillage and zero-tillage practices.</p><p></p><p>If it is the case, as a matter of fact, that there is no extra SOM due to zero-tillage, we can, I think, say with a good degree of certainty that zero-till causes a significant stratification of SOM which you do not see in plough based systems.</p><p></p><p>So, my question then is this: does the same amount of SOM concentrated near to the surface in a stratified way lead to a more fertile and productive soil? If so, should we be using SOM stratification as a more useful metric in assessing soil fertility rather than the error prone loss on ignition SOM tests?</p><p></p><p>Here's a paper which suggests that the answer to the last question should be "yes": <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198702000181" target="_blank">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198702000181</a>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Feldspar, post: 3407730, member: 386"] So this question has been bugging me for a while. I keep hearing recently, and I think I am correct that [USER=801]@martian[/USER] is a proponent of this approach, that no-till is a vital way of sequestering carbon in the efforts to combat elevated atmospheric concentrations. Moreover, and perhaps more relevant to farming in the shorter term, is the claim that this extra SOC will dramatically improve the fertility (and therefore the productivity) of our soils. There is only one problem with this, I think there's a good chance that no-till doesn't actually do the above. To get a really overview of the corpus of academic work on this area pretty much requires this to be your job, but having done a good few hours -- probably tens of hours -- reading around this subject, I come somewhat begrudgingly to hold this viewpoint. There is a lot of erroneous information about SOM / SOC etc under plough and no-till systems. A lot of the errors come from incorrect sampling techniques. For example, sampling too shallowly and failing to correct for bulk density in the samples. Once those mistakes are corrected, the general picture shows surprisingly little difference between tillage and zero-tillage practices. If it is the case, as a matter of fact, that there is no extra SOM due to zero-tillage, we can, I think, say with a good degree of certainty that zero-till causes a significant stratification of SOM which you do not see in plough based systems. So, my question then is this: does the same amount of SOM concentrated near to the surface in a stratified way lead to a more fertile and productive soil? If so, should we be using SOM stratification as a more useful metric in assessing soil fertility rather than the error prone loss on ignition SOM tests? Here's a paper which suggests that the answer to the last question should be "yes": [URL]http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198702000181[/URL]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Regenerative Agriculture and Direct Drilling
Regen Ag General Discussion
No-till versus ploughing -- does increased stratification help?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top