Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Politics, Covid19 and Brexit
Prince Andrew
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Exfarmer" data-source="post: 7935390" data-attributes="member: 1951"><p>I am not defending his actions which I think were immoral, but not illegal ( in the UK) unless proved otherwise. There has to come a point in a girls life when she has to take responsibility for her actions. If you watch the film it is obvious that the vast majority of the girls who got involved with Epstein, never went back a second time. Their reluctance to talk to the police demonstrates they did not think they had been criminally assaulted, but were obviously unhappy at what had occurred.</p><p>We here, believe this point is the age of 16 , other states are older, but many close neighbours in Europe have ages of consent far younger down to 12.</p><p>UK law says a girl under 13 cannot give consent in any form so sexual relations with such a girl is statutory rape.</p><p>The girls in Bradford were far younger, some as young as 10-11 years old. I think all of us would believe a man who abuses girls of that age, deserve severe punishment what ever colour their skin.</p><p>Epstein was an evil abuser who with out doubt, deserved to have been locked away for ever. Andrew is an immoral fool, who deserves ignominy but not in my opinion a criminal record. However stripping him of all privileges is probably in his eyes as bad as it can get.</p><p>If she proves that he raped her , and I have seen no sign of her stating this then, I will change my mind</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Exfarmer, post: 7935390, member: 1951"] I am not defending his actions which I think were immoral, but not illegal ( in the UK) unless proved otherwise. There has to come a point in a girls life when she has to take responsibility for her actions. If you watch the film it is obvious that the vast majority of the girls who got involved with Epstein, never went back a second time. Their reluctance to talk to the police demonstrates they did not think they had been criminally assaulted, but were obviously unhappy at what had occurred. We here, believe this point is the age of 16 , other states are older, but many close neighbours in Europe have ages of consent far younger down to 12. UK law says a girl under 13 cannot give consent in any form so sexual relations with such a girl is statutory rape. The girls in Bradford were far younger, some as young as 10-11 years old. I think all of us would believe a man who abuses girls of that age, deserve severe punishment what ever colour their skin. Epstein was an evil abuser who with out doubt, deserved to have been locked away for ever. Andrew is an immoral fool, who deserves ignominy but not in my opinion a criminal record. However stripping him of all privileges is probably in his eyes as bad as it can get. If she proves that he raped her , and I have seen no sign of her stating this then, I will change my mind [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Politics, Covid19 and Brexit
Prince Andrew
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top