Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Livestock
Livestock & Forage
Sheep Worrying Conviction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Highland Mule" data-source="post: 7873117" data-attributes="member: 33090"><p>I was saving you from reading the whole act - but be my guest.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/1-2/28[/URL]</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not only working hunting dogs (the act says 'working gun dogs', but I tried to mirror your wording previous), it applies to other working dogs too. But you specifically mentioned hunting dogs, so that was the bit I focussed on. Would it help if I clarified that as I don't allow gundogs to work on my land, then they would by default not be lawfully working and hence not subject to the lawful protection of that particular clause?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Highland Mule, post: 7873117, member: 33090"] I was saving you from reading the whole act - but be my guest. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/1-2/28[/URL] Not only working hunting dogs (the act says 'working gun dogs', but I tried to mirror your wording previous), it applies to other working dogs too. But you specifically mentioned hunting dogs, so that was the bit I focussed on. Would it help if I clarified that as I don't allow gundogs to work on my land, then they would by default not be lawfully working and hence not subject to the lawful protection of that particular clause? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Livestock
Livestock & Forage
Sheep Worrying Conviction
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top