Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Agricultural Media
News, PR, Shows and Events
The Guardian view on moth-watching pleasure: the pest and the beauty | Editorial
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="melted welly" data-source="post: 7453214" data-attributes="member: 37168"><p>So when you list the reasons behind the decline you put “agricultural practices” first, then tack on at the end “above all global heating”. </p><p></p><p> 50yrs (during where your study is based), means your study started in the 1970s. More or less hedges/habitat etc pulled out for agriculture in 1960s -70s compared to 2000 onwards? <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤔" title="Thinking face :thinking:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.5/png/unicode/64/1f914.png" data-shortname=":thinking:" /></p><p></p><p>one big change in the last 50yrs is also the number of wildlife and nature charities and campaign groups, which, based on these moth figures would show this explosion of hand-wringing to of had a very negative effect.</p><p></p><p>someone should write an article <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.5/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="melted welly, post: 7453214, member: 37168"] So when you list the reasons behind the decline you put “agricultural practices” first, then tack on at the end “above all global heating”. 50yrs (during where your study is based), means your study started in the 1970s. More or less hedges/habitat etc pulled out for agriculture in 1960s -70s compared to 2000 onwards? 🤔 one big change in the last 50yrs is also the number of wildlife and nature charities and campaign groups, which, based on these moth figures would show this explosion of hand-wringing to of had a very negative effect. someone should write an article 🤣 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Agricultural Media
News, PR, Shows and Events
The Guardian view on moth-watching pleasure: the pest and the beauty | Editorial
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top