Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Politics, Covid19 and Brexit
The most dangerous man in the world
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hindsight" data-source="post: 3537240" data-attributes="member: 3169"><p>Can follow your logic and I expect freeholders throughout the world would concur with the sentiment. Certainly I expect farmers on this forum would concur but what if the activities on said private land affect others off that land? Is that not the case with objectives of the 'Stream Protection Rule'</p><p> </p><p>I am not at all familiar with the broader 'Waters of America' deal but even before today had heard about the 'Stream Protection Rule' and thought it required mine owners to monitor water quality and act if the water was or became contaminated - and in particular would affect hilltop mining - for which I had assumed meant in 'our English' Opencast mining.</p><p> </p><p>Happy to be corrected. regards.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hindsight, post: 3537240, member: 3169"] Can follow your logic and I expect freeholders throughout the world would concur with the sentiment. Certainly I expect farmers on this forum would concur but what if the activities on said private land affect others off that land? Is that not the case with objectives of the 'Stream Protection Rule' I am not at all familiar with the broader 'Waters of America' deal but even before today had heard about the 'Stream Protection Rule' and thought it required mine owners to monitor water quality and act if the water was or became contaminated - and in particular would affect hilltop mining - for which I had assumed meant in 'our English' Opencast mining. Happy to be corrected. regards. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Politics, Covid19 and Brexit
The most dangerous man in the world
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top