Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
The NFU backs gene editing. Do you ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cheesehead" data-source="post: 7732716" data-attributes="member: 12876"><p>I still can't see how that is going to stop farms from producing their own replacements as I can not think of many farms unless already only finishing farms that would give that up other than if they are all ready having to buy in replacements like those sheep farmers with mules. I believe when it first started Innovis tried to keep control of the movement of female replacements but ultimately relaxed a lot of the rules as it involved too much work. I believe the company that also produced the Primera and Highlander breeds had something similar before Innovis took over in this country.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But what is the difference between that and conventional seed houses like DFL, Germinal, KWS or Limagrain.</p><p></p><p>I don't think you're a luddite everyone has their own views and thoughts as well as the right to have them. I too have some reservations and believe their should be safeguards but when the technology has already been help millions like those with diabetes I just believe ignoring it completely seems pointless just as some dictating what others may do seems more akin to those like Animal Rebellion etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cheesehead, post: 7732716, member: 12876"] I still can't see how that is going to stop farms from producing their own replacements as I can not think of many farms unless already only finishing farms that would give that up other than if they are all ready having to buy in replacements like those sheep farmers with mules. I believe when it first started Innovis tried to keep control of the movement of female replacements but ultimately relaxed a lot of the rules as it involved too much work. I believe the company that also produced the Primera and Highlander breeds had something similar before Innovis took over in this country. But what is the difference between that and conventional seed houses like DFL, Germinal, KWS or Limagrain. I don't think you're a luddite everyone has their own views and thoughts as well as the right to have them. I too have some reservations and believe their should be safeguards but when the technology has already been help millions like those with diabetes I just believe ignoring it completely seems pointless just as some dictating what others may do seems more akin to those like Animal Rebellion etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
The NFU backs gene editing. Do you ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top