Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Livestock
Livestock & Forage
The Nuclear Option
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="som farmer" data-source="post: 8595851" data-attributes="member: 86168"><p>there are theories, that we are not the first civilisation to inhabit earth, some pointing to finds, in S Africa, of molten sand/rock, from 100,000's years ago, that the only ''''logical''' conclusion, with the radioactivity readings, that must have been caused by a nuclear explosion. A massive amount of archaeology, is now being found, that is pushing back the accepted 'theory' of this present civilisation's time frame.</p><p></p><p>Just like today's theories about nuclear explosions/war, the lasting effects of an explosion, time wise, are basically guess work. Interesting to know, large underground, cities, with quite complex infrastructure. Have been discovered, across the globe, again with excepted dates of construction, being pushed further back, all the time. Suggesting the planets atmosphere was not conductive to above ground dwelling.</p><p></p><p>So, if true, this shows the world can withstand a nuclear war, and survive, with survivors, that can restart civilisation. There are countless anomalies in archaeology, that make a mockery, of 'accepted' time lines.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="som farmer, post: 8595851, member: 86168"] there are theories, that we are not the first civilisation to inhabit earth, some pointing to finds, in S Africa, of molten sand/rock, from 100,000's years ago, that the only ''''logical''' conclusion, with the radioactivity readings, that must have been caused by a nuclear explosion. A massive amount of archaeology, is now being found, that is pushing back the accepted 'theory' of this present civilisation's time frame. Just like today's theories about nuclear explosions/war, the lasting effects of an explosion, time wise, are basically guess work. Interesting to know, large underground, cities, with quite complex infrastructure. Have been discovered, across the globe, again with excepted dates of construction, being pushed further back, all the time. Suggesting the planets atmosphere was not conductive to above ground dwelling. So, if true, this shows the world can withstand a nuclear war, and survive, with survivors, that can restart civilisation. There are countless anomalies in archaeology, that make a mockery, of 'accepted' time lines. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Livestock
Livestock & Forage
The Nuclear Option
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top