Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
The Red Tractor ACCS referendum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="An Gof" data-source="post: 7393958" data-attributes="member: 300"><p>I have been thinking today and feel we have another very important point to make. </p><p>People like [USER=6]@Clive[/USER] and [USER=38]@dontknowanything[/USER] have highlighted the absurdity of millers demanding home produced UK wheat to commingle with imported wheat that does not carry RT assurance. There is a growing acceptance that this is wrong and deceitful. Some are talking about an 85% system “Australian method” to get around this just to keep us in our place on RT</p><p></p><p>But think how much worse it is with mills and animal feed. Why does all the grain into a fees mill require to be RT assured when it is mixed with a variety of other ingredients, much of which is imported, that carries no similar assurance? </p><p>It’s even worse with feed grains as the % of assured grain is most likely VERY much less than 85% and in some cases may be as low as 10%. </p><p>Another clear example as the stupidity and irrelevance of RT. Perhaps you would care to give us your thoughts on this [USER=4630]@Guy Smith[/USER] as you have shown you appreciate the milling wheat dilemma.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="An Gof, post: 7393958, member: 300"] I have been thinking today and feel we have another very important point to make. People like [USER=6]@Clive[/USER] and [USER=38]@dontknowanything[/USER] have highlighted the absurdity of millers demanding home produced UK wheat to commingle with imported wheat that does not carry RT assurance. There is a growing acceptance that this is wrong and deceitful. Some are talking about an 85% system “Australian method” to get around this just to keep us in our place on RT But think how much worse it is with mills and animal feed. Why does all the grain into a fees mill require to be RT assured when it is mixed with a variety of other ingredients, much of which is imported, that carries no similar assurance? It’s even worse with feed grains as the % of assured grain is most likely VERY much less than 85% and in some cases may be as low as 10%. Another clear example as the stupidity and irrelevance of RT. Perhaps you would care to give us your thoughts on this [USER=4630]@Guy Smith[/USER] as you have shown you appreciate the milling wheat dilemma. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
The Red Tractor ACCS referendum
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top