Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
The Relationship between SFI and CSS ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Two Tone" data-source="post: 7952785" data-attributes="member: 44728"><p>What seems absolutely ridiculous to me is that if you are already in CSS, you cannot be part of the ELMS pilot (on the same land).</p><p>On top of which, those already in CSS, will probably have taken maximum advantage of it and have very little, if any extra capacity to do additional Environmental advantages.</p><p></p><p>Yes, I can understand the double funding issue, but it is far more likely that those of us that are already in CSS, are those who are more likely to want to take advantage of ELMS, once that CSS has ended. And are the ones that would want to make it work.</p><p></p><p>So why prohibit the very people that already have experience of a system that is an Environmental scheme?</p><p>And could probably provide far more insight as to what is good and what is bad about ELMS?</p><p></p><p>Of course this would require some additional recompense for the work involved by the farmer in comparing both. But bearing in mind the derisory sums paid for the ELMS pilots so far, I can’t see this is going to cost the ELMS pilot scheme a lot in comparison to the valuable information that could be learned for Defra (which took over running Natural England a few years ago).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Two Tone, post: 7952785, member: 44728"] What seems absolutely ridiculous to me is that if you are already in CSS, you cannot be part of the ELMS pilot (on the same land). On top of which, those already in CSS, will probably have taken maximum advantage of it and have very little, if any extra capacity to do additional Environmental advantages. Yes, I can understand the double funding issue, but it is far more likely that those of us that are already in CSS, are those who are more likely to want to take advantage of ELMS, once that CSS has ended. And are the ones that would want to make it work. So why prohibit the very people that already have experience of a system that is an Environmental scheme? And could probably provide far more insight as to what is good and what is bad about ELMS? Of course this would require some additional recompense for the work involved by the farmer in comparing both. But bearing in mind the derisory sums paid for the ELMS pilots so far, I can’t see this is going to cost the ELMS pilot scheme a lot in comparison to the valuable information that could be learned for Defra (which took over running Natural England a few years ago). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
The Relationship between SFI and CSS ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top