Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Treasury eyeing up IHT reliefs in upcoming budget?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="How much" data-source="post: 6788950" data-attributes="member: 7392"><p>I dont suppose Dyson would have invested in all that farmland if it where not for the tax breaks it creates for his personal wealth , yes he is farming but are those "farming cost" in line with the personal capital invested ? You could argue it either way I guess but i think not really </p><p></p><p>I think allot of developers and certainty the big PLC house builders wont have invested personal wealth in land , it would be there company cash they have invested and they wont get any tax relief on that in any case so in that regard it would not effect them , that is not say some privately owned house builders wont have done as you suggest.</p><p></p><p>In essence farmland is way over valued , if you cant make money from buying its over valued , so as it is a farmer could not realistically buy arable land with any real world financial situation that had a mix of farming related profit invested say 20% of land value plus some borrowed money and a make a return farming it , in most instances i would think even servicing the debt would be very problematic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="How much, post: 6788950, member: 7392"] I dont suppose Dyson would have invested in all that farmland if it where not for the tax breaks it creates for his personal wealth , yes he is farming but are those "farming cost" in line with the personal capital invested ? You could argue it either way I guess but i think not really I think allot of developers and certainty the big PLC house builders wont have invested personal wealth in land , it would be there company cash they have invested and they wont get any tax relief on that in any case so in that regard it would not effect them , that is not say some privately owned house builders wont have done as you suggest. In essence farmland is way over valued , if you cant make money from buying its over valued , so as it is a farmer could not realistically buy arable land with any real world financial situation that had a mix of farming related profit invested say 20% of land value plus some borrowed money and a make a return farming it , in most instances i would think even servicing the debt would be very problematic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Treasury eyeing up IHT reliefs in upcoming budget?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top