Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
who is going to defend DEFRA on this one?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jackov Altraids" data-source="post: 8802336" data-attributes="member: 3566"><p>The response is simple.</p><p></p><p>Henry Dimbleby and the CCC were wrong in suggesting reducing meat and dairy reduces emissions.</p><p>Significant data has been collected which undermines many original assumptions as well as over use of the deeply flawed study by Poore and Nemecek.</p><p>Their main argument for reduction is land use change, not emissions anyway.</p><p>As meat and dairy CAN be produced at net-zero or better, such a ruling would be discriminatory.</p><p>It would be fairer and lawful to tax any emissions at source.</p><p>The UN's right to food says that everyone has the right to healthy food which should also be culturally appropriate.</p><p>We aren't called le Ros Boeuf for nothing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jackov Altraids, post: 8802336, member: 3566"] The response is simple. Henry Dimbleby and the CCC were wrong in suggesting reducing meat and dairy reduces emissions. Significant data has been collected which undermines many original assumptions as well as over use of the deeply flawed study by Poore and Nemecek. Their main argument for reduction is land use change, not emissions anyway. As meat and dairy CAN be produced at net-zero or better, such a ruling would be discriminatory. It would be fairer and lawful to tax any emissions at source. The UN's right to food says that everyone has the right to healthy food which should also be culturally appropriate. We aren't called le Ros Boeuf for nothing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
who is going to defend DEFRA on this one?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top