- Location
- NSW, Newstralya
how long did the federation drought last?
Sympathy like
Well done on the clear test. Unfortunately we had a reactor on Friday. Still half of them to go unfortunately so who knows what we are going to get.View attachment 693130 View attachment 693132 View attachment 693144
Had our annual tb test today and they all passed
Couldnt get these to move from the field they sort of looked at me and went 'fudge off were comfy leave us alone' had to get off the quad and push a few to get them to move and the top picture is the look i got for doing it they moved after but werent happy about it they were queing up for the crush wanting to go back out was much easier than pushing them through anyway.
Pissing it down now after threatening to rain for the past 2 days so ive come home for the afternoon. Today is a good day
1895 to 1901 apparently. WW2 one went from 39 till 43 millennium one they say from 96 till 2010. Not all of those years would have been bad for everyone though. Take the millennium drought , here it was a couple of very average years scattered until 2007 then it was bad for 3 yearshow long did the federation drought last?
Well done on the clear test. Unfortunately we had a reactor on Friday. Still half of them to go unfortunately so who knows what we are going to get.
Thanks it was a big relief to pass. We had an unconclusive last year that came to nothing after a retest. 4 of my neigjbours have had it recently and one has been down for over a yearWell done on the clear test. Unfortunately we had a reactor on Friday. Still half of them to go unfortunately so who knows what we are going to get.
It could be the best thing you ever do cattle wise !
I bloody hate wild cattle, mostly by having limo’s then Salers.
What a joy !
But a visit to John Douglas nr Stranraer changed that and came home with “Thomas “ the Hereford!
Finally breeding the bonkers out of them , and finding working with them sooo much easier ! As in having to leap over gates head first a lot less !
Got a yearling AA last year to replace him. Going to criss cross the 2 breeds, and defo no more chuffing hot breeds !
Unfortunately not. This one was a proper reactor. Last test had a reactor which came back with lesions. Looks like we will be testing next summer as well now.Thanks it was a big relief to pass. We had an unconclusive last year that came to nothing after a retest. 4 of my neigjbours have had it recently and one has been down for over a year
Im sorry to.hear about your reactor hopefully it will just be the one inconclusive like mine was
2008 was good in WA, and several after that.1895 to 1901 apparently. WW2 one went from 39 till 43 millennium one they say from 96 till 2010. Not all of those years would have been bad for everyone though. Take the millennium drought , here it was a couple of very average years scattered until 2007 then it was bad for 3 years
Why is it bad?
Truthfully, I'm constantly torn regarding ionophores and implants, especially ionophores. At their root, what they do is they increase feed conversion so the animal gets more out of what they eat, therefore requiring less feed to reach a finishing weight. The use of implants can save up to $50 in feed per animal while the use of ionophores can save over $20 every 100 days. If someone owns 1000 animals and can save over $70 on each animal just in feed costs.... You can't fault them their use. Everyone here knows farming is a financial tightrope and you save where you can.
Ionophores also have the added benefit of reducing the animals methane emissions. So while I like the idea of natural raised beef helping support a natural balance in the environment, I can still recognize the hazard potential methane has. Reducing it isn't bad.
As long as scientific research continues to support the evidence that implants don't harm human health and ionophores have no significant impact on antibiotic resistance and bacteria in the soil biom then are they really bad?
Yes, I would rather focus be on breeds with good conversion rates naturally, like Galloways. They can naturally perform at a 4.75 conversion rate while even with inputs, most feedlot animals only reach a 6. But what if you had the genetics and the inputs that allowed you to reduce costs?
Honestly, what I don't like about feedlots are their housing and their feed. An implanted animal on pasture receiving Rumensin is an entirely different animal than an implanted animal receiving Rumensin on a high grain ration. It's the grain that harms them more than the inputs ever will and the housing that requires them to be prophylactically treated and bored out of their minds. Those are what's bad, not the ionophores and not the implants.
Unfortunately not. This one was a proper reactor. Last test had a reactor which came back with lesions. Looks like we will be testing next summer as well now.
I think that many run on the assumption that if they have grass, then it means they are as green.Low Co2 in one thing, but we can do better - Farms have a huge ability to capture Carbon, which makes them more fertile and resilient, and lowers inputs. Farming properly actually has the ability to fix the problems humans have created, whilst capturing water to help stop flooding and hundreds of other benefits.
Last year I captured 1kg on carbon per L of milk produced.
My neighbours who annually plough and have intensive (admittedly organic) dairy herd probably produced more than that
Low Co2 in one thing, but we can do better - Farms have a huge ability to capture Carbon, which makes them more fertile and resilient, and lowers inputs. Farming properly actually has the ability to fix the problems humans have created, whilst capturing water to help stop flooding and hundreds of other benefits.
Last year I captured 1kg on carbon per L of milk produced.
My neighbours who annually plough and have intensive (admittedly organic) dairy herd probably produced more than that
This is the sort of information we need to able to gather and benchmark more easily. I think many would be surprised by the end figures for their enterprises.
May I ask how you went about crunching the numbers and is that 1kg just what was taken into your system or is that the balance after inputs and outputs have been taken into account?