Wellytrack
Member
Luckily have had two sets of twins recently so already have a spare just in case.
She’s lovely and Placid. I think you could negotiate and make a deal with her before the tailgate goes down……..
Luckily have had two sets of twins recently so already have a spare just in case.
I may be wrong but I think France has the presidency of the eu at the moment and Macron is president of France at the moment so I think the answer is yes Macron is in charge of the EU.Is Macron in charge of the EU?
Can be a bit temperamental or so they say!She’s lovely and Placid. I think you could negotiate and make a deal with her before the tailgate goes down……..
It's becoming more & more clear that the US intention from the very start has always been to deplete Russia's military without starting WW3 no mater what the cost would be to Ukraine or it's people.
This is a war that was deliberately manipulated to start by the USA from the very beginning, Putin's been suckered & has reacted in the way they always do!
Biden signs Ukraine 'lend-lease' act
View attachment 1034959
View attachment 1034959President Biden signing the lend-lease act in the Oval Office on MondayImage caption: President Biden signing the lend-lease act in the Oval Office on Monday
US President Joe Biden has signed a bill that aims to streamline American military aid to Ukraine and other Eastern European allies.
The Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022 will ease requirements for lending or leasing US weapons and other materiel.
The measure evokes World War Two's Lend-Lease Act, which allowed the US to fast-track $50bn in aid to allies fighting Nazi Germany.
Speaking in the Oval Office on Monday, Biden said: "The cost of the fight is not cheap. But caving to aggression is even more costly."
On Friday, the Biden administration announced a $150m military package for Ukraine, bringing the total US commitment to $3.8bn.
They had a parade, seen it on the telly.Well, nothing has happened in Russia
BrianV
Member
Livestock Farmer
It's becoming more & more clear that the US intention from the very start has always been to deplete Russia's military without starting WW3 no mater what the cost would be to Ukraine or it's people.
This is a war that was deliberately manipulated to start by the USA from the very beginning, Putin's been suckered & has reacted in the way they always do!
The Russians weren't equipped to go in as they didn't expect to need to, what the Russians didn't plan for or expect were the weapons, men & training supplied by the US & UK already in Ukraine with eyes in the sky 24/7 ready to take out as much Russian military hardware within weeks of them crossing the border, don't think for a minute it's only Ukrainians alone that have been doing the damage.i don’t think that’s the case
I think everyone thought putin would go in and take a couple of weeks to take over
two things surprised everybody was how poor the Russian army was equipped and disorganised
and how determined,and how well the Ukrainians have done
The Russians weren't equipped to go in as they didn't expect to need to, what the Russians didn't plan for or expect were the weapons, men & training supplied by the US & UK already in Ukraine with eyes in the sky 24/7 ready to take out as much Russian military hardware within weeks of them crossing the border, don't think for a minute it's only Ukrainians alone that have been doing the damage.
So why are we being told that they will go into Finland etc etc?It's becoming more & more clear that the US intention from the very start has always been to deplete Russia's military without starting WW3 no mater what the cost would be to Ukraine or it's people.
This is a war that was deliberately manipulated to start by the USA from the very beginning, Putin's been suckered & has reacted in the way they always do!
Biden signs Ukraine 'lend-lease' act
View attachment 1034959
View attachment 1034959President Biden signing the lend-lease act in the Oval Office on MondayImage caption: President Biden signing the lend-lease act in the Oval Office on Monday
US President Joe Biden has signed a bill that aims to streamline American military aid to Ukraine and other Eastern European allies.
The Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022 will ease requirements for lending or leasing US weapons and other materiel.
The measure evokes World War Two's Lend-Lease Act, which allowed the US to fast-track $50bn in aid to allies fighting Nazi Germany.
Speaking in the Oval Office on Monday, Biden said: "The cost of the fight is not cheap. But caving to aggression is even more costly."
On Friday, the Biden administration announced a $150m military package for Ukraine, bringing the total US commitment to $3.8bn.
WellThe Russians weren't equipped to go in as they didn't expect to need to, what the Russians didn't plan for or expect were the weapons, men & training supplied by the US & UK already in Ukraine with eyes in the sky 24/7 ready to take out as much Russian military hardware within weeks of them crossing the border, don't think for a minute it's only Ukrainians alone that have been doing the damage.
Even if he thinks it true, you'd think Macron would have the sense - and decency - to wind his neck in a bit on the matter... I guess he doesn't want any more Eastern States that, as he put it, 'don't know their place', to give Poland, Czechia etc. more weight.
Ukraine bid to join EU will take decades says Macron
The French leader suggests other ways the EU can help Ukraine, other than fast tracking its membership.www.bbc.co.uk
I may be wrong but I think France has the presidency of the eu at the moment and Macron is president of France at the moment so I think the answer is yes Macron is in charge of the EU.
Well you must be pretty stupid in that case. Of course the US and UK had to come in and defend Ukraine they had no option not to unless you dont believe in abiding by the agreement signed by US UK and Russia to enable the Ukraine to give up their nuclear weapons. Do you really think Russia would have invaded if Ukraine still had a nuclear arsenal.The Russians weren't equipped to go in as they didn't expect to need to, what the Russians didn't plan for or expect were the weapons, men & training supplied by the US & UK already in Ukraine with eyes in the sky 24/7 ready to take out as much Russian military hardware within weeks of them crossing the border, don't think for a minute it's only Ukrainians alone that have been doing the damage.
I would rather both UK and Ukraine join EFTA and make it a viable alternative to the EU model.Please would he be kind enough to explain why it would take decades for the Ukrainians to join and yet the rest of Eastern Europe joined in a huge lump?
I think the big one is disputed territories. The EU wouldn't be keen to give Ukraine full membership whilst there are conflicts and massive territorial disputes over Crimea and the Donbas. Plus, I suspect there are many other economic and social criteria that need addressing as well. Macron's idea of some form of associate membership in the meantime is a reasonable proposal.Please would he be kind enough to explain why it would take decades for the Ukrainians to join and yet the rest of Eastern Europe joined in a huge lump?
It didn't work first time round when the UK tried to make it an alternative to the EU. Why do you think it would work now?I would rather both UK and Ukraine join EFTA and make it a viable alternative to the EU model.
Do you think we would all be still here if they had, Ukraine is not all full of poor gentle peace loving souls as we are being led to believe, I can only go by what I have been told by someone close enough to know what really went on & was involved at a very early stage, you can believe what you like.Well you must be pretty stupid in that case. Of course the US and UK had to come in and defend Ukraine they had no option not to unless you dont believe in abiding by the agreement signed by US UK and Russia to enable the Ukraine to give up their nuclear weapons. Do you really think Russia would have invaded if Ukraine still had a nuclear arsenal.
Probably more takers; as I wrote before, if I was an advocate for the EU I would be telling Macron and chums to back up the Eastern States 100%. For the EU's long term, not to do so is just sowing dragon's teeth, because one they have more or less economic parity with the founders, their strongest reason for EU membership will have gone.It didn't work first time round when the UK tried to make it an alternative to the EU. Why do you think it would work now?
Do you think we would all be still here if they had, Ukraine is not all full of poor gentle peace loving souls as we are being led to believe, I can only go by what I have been told by someone close enough to know what really went on & was involved at a very early stage, you can believe what you like.
If you are prepared to think of alternative explanations then you will find some things definitely don't really add up!