DEFRA: Independent review calls for radical plan for England’s National Parks

JP1

Member
Livestock Farmer
Press release
Independent review calls for radical plan for England’s National Parks
Major review calls for biggest shakeup of the running of England’s National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty since they were founded 70 years ago.
Published 21 September 2019
Last updated 21 September 2019 — see all updates
From:Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and The Rt Hon Theresa Villiers

Dartmoor National Park

Seventy years after the Act of Parliament that created the first National Parks, a major independent review – led by writer Julian Glover – has called for bold action to reignite the founding spirit of our great National Park movement in order to make them greener, more beautiful and open to everyone.
The review published today (Saturday 21 September) praises the brilliant work which has been done to maintain the beauty of places such as the Lake District, Exmoor and the Dorset coast.
But it warns that new challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and a changing, urban society mean that new approaches are needed to get the most out of England’s most-loved landscapes, including National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs).
Key recommendations include:
  • a new National Landscapes Service to act as a unified body for England’s 44 national landscapes, including 10 National Parks and 34 AONBs
  • creating a 1,000 strong ranger service to be the “friendly face” of our national parks and help engage schools and communities
  • giving every school pupil the opportunity to spend a night “under the stars” in these special landscapes to help more children to connect with nature
  • new protections, responsibilities, titles and funding for AONBs to help them be greener, more beautiful and more welcoming to the public
  • a transformed approach to recover and enhance nature, working with farmers and conservation groups to reverse years of decline and bring landscapes alive
  • backing for a new National Park in the Chilterns and a new National Forest, taking in areas such as Sherwood Forest, as part of a drive to increase woodland spaces to fight climate change
The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, which commissioned the review, will now consider the recommendations.
Welcoming the findings, Environment Secretary Theresa Villiers said:
These landscapes are the jewels in the crown of our countryside and are a cornerstone of our rural economy. We are committed to ensuring they flourish as havens for nature and sites that everyone in the country goes to visit for inspiration, adventure or relaxation.
That’s why we asked Julian and his panel to conduct this review and I am very grateful to them for their efforts. I welcome and agree with the spirit of ambition, which is in line with our 25 Year Environment Plan, and we will now carefully consider the recommendations set out in the review.
Julian Glover, who led the review, said:
From the high fells of the Lake District to the wildness of Exmoor, England’s most beautiful places define our country. Today we are setting out a big, bold plan to bring them alive to tackle the crisis in our natural environment and make sure they are there for everyone to enjoy.
If we take action, we can make our country healthier, happier, greener, more beautiful and part of all our lives. Seventy years ago this year we created our national parks for a nation that had just won the Second World War. Now it’s time to reignite that mission.
Tony Juniper, Chair of Natural England which is the government’s statutory landscape adviser, said:
We very much welcome the Glover Review and its core message that our national parks and AONBs should be the very backbone of the new Nature Recovery Network that we are working to build. These are the places that often spring to mind when people think about enjoying the natural world and by making them richer in wildlife as well as more accessible we can help people from all walks of life experience their inspirational beauty.
The report also raises concerns about the process of designating national landscapes. We share these concerns and have taken steps in recent years to streamline the system where possible, in the context of budget difficulties that lead us to do far less than we would like to.
Today’s announcement builds on existing government commitments to protect and enhance the natural environment, which include a pledge to restore 75% of our protected sites to favourable condition, invest £50 million to help plant new woodlands through the Woodland Carbon Guarantee, and create a vast Northern Forest – which will see 50 million trees planted from Liverpool to Hull over the next 25 years.
Corinne Pluchino, Chief Executive of Campaign for National Parks said:
We welcome the timely publication of this ambitious agenda for our most beautiful landscapes.
There is an pressing need to address the urgent challenges in our National Parks. We will be reviewing the report in detail and will be working to ensure the momentum is maintained.
AONBs and National Parks are some of England’s most cherished sites, spanning from the Lake District, which was recently announced as a UNESCO World Heritage site, to the picturesque Cornwall AONB.
They cover a quarter of England’s land and are home to over 2.3 million people – with more than 66 per cent of us living within half an hour of a National Park or AONB. They also generate more than £20 billion for the rural economy, and support 75,000 jobs.
The review is one of the key commitments of the government’s 25 Year Environment Plan, which outlines our vision for improving the environment over a generation by connecting people with nature and helping wildlife to thrive.
It follows a call for evidence which received more than 2,500 responses on how England’s 10 National Parks and 34 AONBs meet the nation’s needs in the 21st century and whether there is scope for the current network to expand.
The review also makes recommendations to introduce more innovative, enterprising ways to generate funds that can be invested in these spaces, in addition to further government funding.
Further information
The recommendations of the Designated Landscapes review will now be considered and responded to by the government in due course.
The 27 recommendations of the review include:
  • new long-term programmes to increase the number of BAME visitors
  • expanding volunteering in our national landscapes
  • better information and signs to guide visitors
  • a ranger service in all our national landscapes, part of a national family
  • consider expanding open access rights in national landscapes
  • a new National Landscapes Housing Association to build affordable homes.
  • new designated landscapes and a new national forest. The review recommended three large AONBs should be considered for National Park status – The Cotswolds, and Dorset. The review would also support the designation of the Forest of Dean as a national landscape. The review also recommended there is a strong case for a new national forest taking in areas such as Sherwood Forest, north of Nottingham and south of Worksop.
  • a new National Landscapes Service to bring the National Parks and AONBstogether and set greater ambitions
  • welcoming new landscape approaches in cities and the coast, and a city park competition
  • a new financial model – more money, more secure, more enterprising
Sir Arthur Hobhouse’s landmark report in 1947 paved the way for the creation of England’s network of designated areas, with the National Parks Act and Access to the Countryside Act passed in 1949.
The Act, described at the time as a “recreational gift to Britain’s returning Second World War service men and women”, set out to recognise, conserve and enhance access to landscapes deemed to be “of national importance and quality”.
These days the rugged mountains, unspoilt coastlines and vast moorlands of the nation’s 10 National Parks attract more than 94 million visitors a year from at home and abroad.
Background
Julian Glover – Lead Reviewer

Associate editor at the London Evening Standard and author of the biography Man of Iron: Thomas Telford and the Building of Britain. He has worked as leader writer and columnist at the Guardian and as a Special Adviser in Number 10 and the Department for Transport. Lord Cameron of Dillington.
Cross-bench peer, farmer and landowner. As the former Chair of the Countryside Agency, he is a strong advocate for rural affairs. He is currently the chair of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 Committee and the Advisory Council for the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology. He is also on the Steering Board of the Government’s Global Food Security Programme.
Jim Dixon
Chief Executive of the Peak District National Park Authority for 12 years, before stepping down in 2014. He is currently a writer on countryside issues, including for the Times, and a trustee of the Heritage Lottery Fund.
Sarah Mukherjee
Former BBC environment and rural affairs correspondent and previous Director of Environment at Water UK. She is currently Chief Executive of the Crop Protection Association. She is a trustee and advisory group member for several charities, supporting both environmental stewardship and education in farming.
Dame Fiona Reynolds
Formerly the Director-General of the National Trust and current Master of Emmanuel College, Cambridge and Chair of the Green Alliance. She is the author of The Fight for Beauty (2016), a history of thought and public policy on landscapes and environment in Britain.
Jake Fiennes
Became General Manager for Conservation of the 25,000 acre Holkham Estate in autumn 2018 after 24 years as Estate Manager promoting nature conservation alongside arable farming at Raveningham Estate. He is also a trustee and advisory group member of several organisations including the National Farmers’ Union’s Environmental Forum and the Norfolk Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group.
 

Bald Rick

Moderator
Livestock Farmer
Location
Anglesey
I think the thousands of people who flock to these beautiful locations are the actual cause of their decline
Make them wild and ban public is the way forward

No idea why they encourage mountain biking. Snowdonian footpaths are getting trashed off any hard paving

Put an urban kid in the wild and they’d sh!t themselves. Doubt they’d be “hard” when an owl hoots or a fox shrieks, never mind a sheep coughing
 

Granite Farmer

Member
Mixed Farmer
Whats the obsession with getting BAME people everywhere. They are f**king human beings just like us who can make up their own mind as to weather or not they want to visit national parks etc.


I was in the Peak district over they August bank holiday and visited Dovedale a proportional amount BAME there I would of said.
 
Last edited:

DrWazzock

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire
The best thing anyone can do to help nature is stay out of the countryside. Why do people think it's there to be enjoyed? It isn't that interesting or exciting and observation tends to disrupt or damage it. I can't think of anything more boring than a "visit to the countryside", unless I am yoking up a 250 hp tractor to a ten furrow wagon plough.

OK, birds raise chicks in nests. Good for them. Let them get on with it in peace. Don't trample or let your dog out the birds up. Stay in town and go to a club. Much more interesting. Or tinker with some technology. That's what being human is all about. Yes we need space for nature, but best thing we can do is it leave it well alone to get in with it.
 

Jackov Altraids

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Devon
Seems a perfectly reasonable review to me.

How it gets implemented is another matter.

I fear a new 'National Landscapes Service' will just be given a large fund to go off and play with. Lots of staff in big new shiny 4x4's going back to government complaining how bad everything is and how they need more money and powers.
I would imagine it will be on the 2032 tory manifesto to abolish the 'NLS' due to it's huge budget returning no benefits. Of course, the fact there have been no benefits will all be due to evil farmers and landowners, not because they've spent a decade pissing in the wind.
 

texas pete

Member
Location
East Mids
It's f**kwittery of the highest order.

Draconian rules, directives and beliefs that render a business unviable, to then be replaced with job creation schemes and then lauded for their success and the jobs created. The Irony will be lost on these clever beggars though.

Employing "rangers" to manage land when it had been managed beforehand, and certainly before the national parks came into being.

It's land nationalisation by the back door and echoes the sentiments of the National Trust, with their "we know best" attitude.
 

exmoor dave

Member
Location
exmoor, uk
Here, Outside of planning issues, NP don't really have much of a say on land management within the NP apart from the land they own in-house.
Natural england via SSSI's and landlords such as NT have a far bigger say (&agenda!).

We had the pleasure of sitting down with Mr Glover on his exmoor stint of his tour of the NPs to produce his report.
Our main points were that National parks are not a snap shot of a particular point in time that must be maintained to that exact image, rather they are living working environments that must be able to move with the times.
That means that houses must be available to help keep people with in the parks, if 2nd homes aren't going to be controlled, then new houses must be able to be built, not just extra houses here and there on farms, but developments in the villages.

NPs must be more business friendy, if businesses can't develop and grow with in a NP, they'll leave, taking people with them, which ultimately ends up with services like pubs, village shops, schools etc etc going to.
For example a local fencer wants to open a very basic yard to supply fencing materials, but is being blocked by the NP and all the objectors are wealthy incomers people who have bought property on the moor. But small business like this is as much the life blood of areas like this, as farmers, foresters etc etc are.
 
Here, Outside of planning issues, NP don't really have much of a say on land management within the NP apart from the land they own in-house.
Natural england via SSSI's and landlords such as NT have a far bigger say (&agenda!).

We had the pleasure of sitting down with Mr Glover on his exmoor stint of his tour of the NPs to produce his report.
Our main points were that National parks are not a snap shot of a particular point in time that must be maintained to that exact image, rather they are living working environments that must be able to move with the times.
That means that houses must be available to help keep people with in the parks, if 2nd homes aren't going to be controlled, then new houses must be able to be built, not just extra houses here and there on farms, but developments in the villages.

NPs must be more business friendy, if businesses can't develop and grow with in a NP, they'll leave, taking people with them, which ultimately ends up with services like pubs, village shops, schools etc etc going to.
For example a local fencer wants to open a very basic yard to supply fencing materials, but is being blocked by the NP and all the objectors are wealthy incomers people who have bought property on the moor. But small business like this is as much the life blood of areas like this, as farmers, foresters etc etc are.


If any member of the public tried to build on a SSSI you'd have no chance.

The government on the other hand can and does build on SSSIs.

I once tried to get many different River Trusts, Environment Agency, Natural England, Environmental Groups to help fight off a government project on a SSSI. Not a single one would help. I eventually realised that ALL these groups get paid by HMG one way or another. They are little more than a bunch of paid stooges to gang up on the general public to stop them or put them under the cosh.

I even got some Freedom of Information from some of the groups which stated how they were helping various government departments overcome their own Environmental standards, telling them how to get around various rules.

These environmental groups are as two faced as they come IMHO.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 105 40.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 94 36.3%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.1%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 13 5.0%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,710
  • 32
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top