- Location
- Northumberland
That`s true here
Before the enclosures most of the parish was open common with small field near farmsteads.
Most of the hedges were planted early 1800`s. With the 3000 m we have planted last 3 years more hedges than ever
GFC was to go ahead - now not going ahead
- Thread starter Vader
- Start date
Before the enclosures most of the parish was open common with small field near farmsteads.
Most of the hedges were planted early 1800`s. With the 3000 m we have planted last 3 years more hedges than ever
- Location
- East Yorkshire
It wasn't listed in FW article.
- Location
- Glen Clova, Angus, DD8 4RD
- Location
- East Yorkshire
who should be and who is consulted will prob be poles apart
- Location
- East Yorkshire
Pretty sure there was.Agreed.
No mending of who WILL be consulted yet........
yellow belly
Member
- Location
- south west lincolnshire
Most farms had less hedges before the enclosure acts 1780s to 18 20s
More than 3/4 of my hedges put in during that time
- Location
- Yorks
Maybe our own fault for not (having time) asking to be part of it. Or maybe they might have thought to ask us. Maybe they'd have wanted a financial contribution
Guess we should ask the review commissioners if/how we can contribute. Presumably AHDB and the listed farming unions will have been involved in setting the remit, so how can we be on the inside and make sure the remit is appropriate, have sight of all the review submissions.
Should individual review submissions be kept private or published (with anonymity)?
- Location
- Yorks
Or respondents could have the option if their responses will be made public or not.Maybe our own fault for not (having time) asking to be part of it. Or maybe they might have thought to ask us. Maybe they'd have wanted a financial contribution
Guess we should ask the review commissioners if/how we can contribute. Presumably AHDB and the listed farming unions will have been involved in setting the remit, so how can we be on the inside and make sure the remit is appropriate, have sight of all the review submissions.
Should individual review submissions be kept private or published (with anonymity)?
It would be a good idea to make a formal request to take part in this. You after all represent farmers who may have no other voice and who maybe over looked in this process.Maybe our own fault for not (having time) asking to be part of it. Or maybe they might have thought to ask us. Maybe they'd have wanted a financial contribution
Guess we should ask the review commissioners if/how we can contribute. Presumably AHDB and the listed farming unions will have been involved in setting the remit, so how can we be on the inside and make sure the remit is appropriate, have sight of all the review submissions.
Should individual review submissions be kept private or published (with anonymity)?
A formal request to the review commissioners to take part should provoke a response to the BFU which may allow us to gauge how they view the BFU and it's work thus far.
We do need a place at the table.
This
- Location
- Essex
- Location
- Herefordshire
- Location
- Durham, UK
This is one small step in the right direction, but no answers as to who did what & when or indeed why?
- Location
- Durham, UK
Help themselves morelikeThe module was developed to help farmers,
Homesy
Member
- Location
- North West Devon
Red Tractor is running scared.
Time to put it out of it’s misery.
Time to put it out of it’s misery.
- Location
- Northleach, Gloucestershire
£295,000 was spent by dead tractor in developing the module according to the FW - looks like the subs will be going up next year 
NFU arranging to consult members