Cowabunga
Member
- Location
- Ceredigion,Wales
No you may not.Can I ask- what is your masters degree in then?
No you may not.Can I ask- what is your masters degree in then?
Right in the middle of the video the man at the top of Pfizer along with Gates the people who made millions lying about the therapeutic
That’s fantastic pseudology. Epic mythomania. Top level prevarication.
The truth doesn’t need any of that, what an absolute scam from start to finish.
Can I ask- what is your masters degree in then?
No you may not.
I passed my driving test 2nd time ,I see, so you are ridiculing someone's qualifications without declaring your own?
She hasn’t declared them properly.I see, so you are ridiculing someone's qualifications without declaring your own?
They say the best drivers pass second time round.I passed my driving test 2nd time ,
Failed on speeding 1st time , ha haThey say the best drivers pass second time round.
Some fail for mounting a kerb with the back wheel on a tight left handerFailed on speeding 1st time , ha ha
Someone claimed a qualification but did not specify the subject. I asked what the claimed qualification was about. Not had an answer and that’s fine.I see, so you are ridiculing someone's qualifications without declaring your own?
It's an open forum , people stick their noses in , that's how it worksSomeone claimed a qualification but did not specify the subject. I asked what the claimed qualification was about. Not had an answer and that’s fine.
You again have to poke you nose in. Obviously. It was expected.
Someone claimed a qualification but did not specify the subject. I asked what the claimed qualification was about. Not had an answer and that’s fine.
You again have to poke you nose in. Obviously. It was expected.
You can't help yourself but get personal with people- I've concluded it is about the only way you can make up for your lacklustre discussions skills.
The fact someone has completed a degree, particularly in science, should indicate to you they know how to critically view information and determine it's weight and validity before forming their own opinion. This is something you spectacularly fail at. Only the most petty individual would dare go on to criticise someone's qualifications when you yourself have none. What a cowardly thing to do.
Your lack of ability to understand quite simple concepts is noted once more.I don't know what is worse, the fact you'd sink to that kind of comment, or the fact you are choosing to resort to it because someone made points you disagreed with, and of all the topics to become so militant over- a fudging medicine the vast majority of this forum will never have any experience of or contact with whatsoever. That is outright sad really, but still, should we be surprised you've hit this new low?
I haven’t criticised and qualification because I do not even know what the qualification is for. I asked the question. That you cannot understand that very basic point says it all really. I responded with two questions. Both have a single answer which has not been forthcoming from someone that volunteered half an answer previously. That person is not you. I have not asked for your qualifications as you have not volunteered it.
Your lack of ability to understand quite simple concepts is noted once more.
I just wondered what was going on in Covid world and realised that this needed to be said some https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_thinking is needed - and I totally realise won't be listened to - but hope it might help bring some civility to the topic*
Notable points:
Critical thinking calls for the ability to:
- Recognize problems, to find workable means for meeting those problems
- Understand the importance of prioritization and order of precedence in problem-solving
- Gather and marshal pertinent (relevant) information
- Recognize unstated assumptions and values
- Comprehend and use language with accuracy, clarity, and discernment
- Interpret data, to appraise evidence and evaluate arguments
- Recognize the existence (or non-existence) of logical relationships between propositions
- Draw warranted conclusions and generalizations
- Put to test the conclusions and generalizations at which one arrives
- Reconstruct one's patterns of beliefs on the basis of wider experience
- Render accurate judgments about specific things and qualities in everyday life
In sum:
"A persistent effort to examine any belief or supposed form of knowledge in the light of the evidence that supports or refutes it and the further conclusions to which it tends."[37]
*It probably wont, but was worth a try.
thanksI just wondered what was going on in Covid world and realised that this needed to be said some https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_thinking is needed - and I totally realise won't be listened to - but hope it might help bring some civility to the topic*
Notable points:
Critical thinking calls for the ability to:
- Recognize problems, to find workable means for meeting those problems
- Understand the importance of prioritization and order of precedence in problem-solving
- Gather and marshal pertinent (relevant) information
- Recognize unstated assumptions and values
- Comprehend and use language with accuracy, clarity, and discernment
- Interpret data, to appraise evidence and evaluate arguments
- Recognize the existence (or non-existence) of logical relationships between propositions
- Draw warranted conclusions and generalizations
- Put to test the conclusions and generalizations at which one arrives
- Reconstruct one's patterns of beliefs on the basis of wider experience
- Render accurate judgments about specific things and qualities in everyday life
In sum:
"A persistent effort to examine any belief or supposed form of knowledge in the light of the evidence that supports or refutes it and the further conclusions to which it tends."[37]
*It probably wont, but was worth a try.
Is that an unreasonable question? Ollie can show you his then.No you may not.