Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
21st of June
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Highland Mule" data-source="post: 7430289" data-attributes="member: 33090"><p>Some evidence to back up these claims would be interesting, but that doesn't accord with my understanding. I've made bold the parts I'm particularly keen to see/ don't agree with. Bear in mind that half the planet didn't have "the first boost of the novel virus culminating last spring".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Erm, F&M ?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, would be interesting to see what you base this assertion on as I know no facts to back it up. "Co-morbidities" as declared by the death certificates are very different from "seriously ill".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not aware that dementia is a death sentence in itself, so perhaps a bad example on your part, in the context of the previous quote?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I really don't think we will, but am prepared to listen - what's the basis of your conclusion, and is it based on anything more than an uneducated hunch? We have the best public health minds in the world looking at this issue, most developed countries are adopting similar strategies and there is minimal complaint from the mainstream scientific community aside from concern that the lockdowns were and may be being lifted too soon.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Initially yes, latterly not so much so - unless you can show different? Last I saw the spread was firmly in the wider community.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Highland Mule, post: 7430289, member: 33090"] Some evidence to back up these claims would be interesting, but that doesn't accord with my understanding. I've made bold the parts I'm particularly keen to see/ don't agree with. Bear in mind that half the planet didn't have "the first boost of the novel virus culminating last spring". Erm, F&M ? Again, would be interesting to see what you base this assertion on as I know no facts to back it up. "Co-morbidities" as declared by the death certificates are very different from "seriously ill". Not aware that dementia is a death sentence in itself, so perhaps a bad example on your part, in the context of the previous quote? I really don't think we will, but am prepared to listen - what's the basis of your conclusion, and is it based on anything more than an uneducated hunch? We have the best public health minds in the world looking at this issue, most developed countries are adopting similar strategies and there is minimal complaint from the mainstream scientific community aside from concern that the lockdowns were and may be being lifted too soon. Initially yes, latterly not so much so - unless you can show different? Last I saw the spread was firmly in the wider community. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
21st of June
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top