Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
BBC Today listen, then BBC“World at One” radio4.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SilliamWhale" data-source="post: 8493085" data-attributes="member: 1232"><p>There were 300 pollution events. I'd be interested in what the "major incidents" were and what the non major incidents were.</p><p></p><p>No pollution is good but it could be the 280 non major incidents were some bad management issue that could be corrected.</p><p></p><p>The 20 major incidents may have a different flavour.</p><p></p><p>We definitely know the water boards are polluting with human sewage. Wilfully</p><p></p><p>The flipside is how much did Kate Hoare have to pay to have a covered slurry pit and methane extraction? Would it have been grant aided or paid from the business of milking cows? If the former is this available to all farmers?</p><p></p><p>edit - the council and a private company paid for it (not a criticism of the farmer doing it but it does add a different flavour to it)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SilliamWhale, post: 8493085, member: 1232"] There were 300 pollution events. I'd be interested in what the "major incidents" were and what the non major incidents were. No pollution is good but it could be the 280 non major incidents were some bad management issue that could be corrected. The 20 major incidents may have a different flavour. We definitely know the water boards are polluting with human sewage. Wilfully The flipside is how much did Kate Hoare have to pay to have a covered slurry pit and methane extraction? Would it have been grant aided or paid from the business of milking cows? If the former is this available to all farmers? edit - the council and a private company paid for it (not a criticism of the farmer doing it but it does add a different flavour to it) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
BBC Today listen, then BBC“World at One” radio4.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top