Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
ELMS co-design submissions.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave645" data-source="post: 8178934" data-attributes="member: 55822"><p>You say co design for the local nature recovery scheme, to do so we would need an outline of the type of work that it covers it’s scope a lot of details, basically what’s in your instruction remit from the government.</p><p>What if we disagree with the instruction remit for the scheme?</p><p>To be part of the design we would also want to give feed back on the remit for the schemes goals.</p><p></p><p>my personal opinion is that all the schemes should be capped, by that I mean not on a per scheme Capp, but total per farm cap.</p><p></p><p>So the money is spread evenly. Every farm under 100ha has the chance to claim the same amount of their full BPS money from schemes. Plus let’s say a 20% max.</p><p></p><p>Say I am happy to do a NRS and put in for a nice big one, my aim is to total replace all the money I once got from BPS, you say yes that’s fine, then great I have hit my money cap, with the money linked to inflation etc.</p><p></p><p>but if I cannot go big or my area is not one you want a large NRS then my pot is there so I have to do a little from all 3 schemes to get it.</p><p></p><p>I also still believe that scheme money should be on the first 100ha of every farms claimed BPS money, and that simple ways to unlock that money that don’t effect overall profitability of the farm are needed.</p><p>Most big farms can find 100ha of less productive land or areas of a much bigger farm to put 100ha into a scheme that will earn the same money as BPS did.</p><p>What moneys left is then split up by farmers over the 100ha size to put into schemes that they can implement.</p><p></p><p>My point is in the end the NRS is going to have the biggest effect, if you tie money to schemes rather than farms you may miss small farms putting in for NRS schemes. </p><p>in some respects opening all 3 schemes with this type of funding at the same time, may well see you get far larger uptake of NRS and rather than 3 schemes it’s one that’s multi faceted.</p><p>Working on a farm level budget of BPS plus 10-20% max on the first 100ha and any claim over that max that has more land is put in a competitive scheme for items over the 100ha money cap. </p><p>that gets you every farmer that want to put the first 100ha into the super scheme to get the equiverlent to bps money as the pot sits there for say 5 years in their farms name if they still farm it. Not accumulating just ear marked.</p><p>So farms get 5 years to fine tune their application.</p><p></p><p>super rushed so no doubt full of errors but hay ho it’s off to work I go.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave645, post: 8178934, member: 55822"] You say co design for the local nature recovery scheme, to do so we would need an outline of the type of work that it covers it’s scope a lot of details, basically what’s in your instruction remit from the government. What if we disagree with the instruction remit for the scheme? To be part of the design we would also want to give feed back on the remit for the schemes goals. my personal opinion is that all the schemes should be capped, by that I mean not on a per scheme Capp, but total per farm cap. So the money is spread evenly. Every farm under 100ha has the chance to claim the same amount of their full BPS money from schemes. Plus let’s say a 20% max. Say I am happy to do a NRS and put in for a nice big one, my aim is to total replace all the money I once got from BPS, you say yes that’s fine, then great I have hit my money cap, with the money linked to inflation etc. but if I cannot go big or my area is not one you want a large NRS then my pot is there so I have to do a little from all 3 schemes to get it. I also still believe that scheme money should be on the first 100ha of every farms claimed BPS money, and that simple ways to unlock that money that don’t effect overall profitability of the farm are needed. Most big farms can find 100ha of less productive land or areas of a much bigger farm to put 100ha into a scheme that will earn the same money as BPS did. What moneys left is then split up by farmers over the 100ha size to put into schemes that they can implement. My point is in the end the NRS is going to have the biggest effect, if you tie money to schemes rather than farms you may miss small farms putting in for NRS schemes. in some respects opening all 3 schemes with this type of funding at the same time, may well see you get far larger uptake of NRS and rather than 3 schemes it’s one that’s multi faceted. Working on a farm level budget of BPS plus 10-20% max on the first 100ha and any claim over that max that has more land is put in a competitive scheme for items over the 100ha money cap. that gets you every farmer that want to put the first 100ha into the super scheme to get the equiverlent to bps money as the pot sits there for say 5 years in their farms name if they still farm it. Not accumulating just ear marked. So farms get 5 years to fine tune their application. super rushed so no doubt full of errors but hay ho it’s off to work I go. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
ELMS co-design submissions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top