Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
ELMS co-design submissions.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave645" data-source="post: 8179455" data-attributes="member: 55822"><p>The point did not escape me, it was exactly why I made that suggestion. . . </p><p>farming does for free more than these other groups put together do.</p><p>So why are they entitled to farmings support payments, especaly the small farmers support payment.</p><p>I don’t think they are more entitled to it, so hence my suggestion, in the end it will be up to each farmer to decide if anything in the schemes is worth doing, but it’s seems a poor solution to not give all farmers all the options from the get go to see which scheme type will suit them best and claim their pot from.</p><p>DEFRA may have ended up with lots of NR projects, that actually deliver far greater benefit to nature in the long run.</p><p>Leaving the farmer just one thing to implement, not several.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave645, post: 8179455, member: 55822"] The point did not escape me, it was exactly why I made that suggestion. . . farming does for free more than these other groups put together do. So why are they entitled to farmings support payments, especaly the small farmers support payment. I don’t think they are more entitled to it, so hence my suggestion, in the end it will be up to each farmer to decide if anything in the schemes is worth doing, but it’s seems a poor solution to not give all farmers all the options from the get go to see which scheme type will suit them best and claim their pot from. DEFRA may have ended up with lots of NR projects, that actually deliver far greater benefit to nature in the long run. Leaving the farmer just one thing to implement, not several. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
ELMS co-design submissions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top