Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Farming REALITY CHECK!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bossfarmer" data-source="post: 3024676" data-attributes="member: 44492"><p>Scenario 1</p><p>If the farmer is from the UK and the EU are still getting their subsidies then we should back our own farmers and give them the same as he will be competing without subs in a subsidy driven environment which is a bit like pushing water up a hill!!</p><p></p><p>Scenario 2</p><p>The farmer deserves the £70k because his competition is also receiving it and in a bad year some of that £70k may be needed to pay the worker, the worker has a cottage and is not responsible for the upkeep of the cottage/farm/reinvesting in buildings/infrastructure and machinery and is not competing in a subsidy driven environment he simply takes his wage and also doesn't have all his money tied up in the business</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bossfarmer, post: 3024676, member: 44492"] Scenario 1 If the farmer is from the UK and the EU are still getting their subsidies then we should back our own farmers and give them the same as he will be competing without subs in a subsidy driven environment which is a bit like pushing water up a hill!! Scenario 2 The farmer deserves the £70k because his competition is also receiving it and in a bad year some of that £70k may be needed to pay the worker, the worker has a cottage and is not responsible for the upkeep of the cottage/farm/reinvesting in buildings/infrastructure and machinery and is not competing in a subsidy driven environment he simply takes his wage and also doesn't have all his money tied up in the business [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Farming REALITY CHECK!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top