simmy_bull
Member
- Location
- North Yorkshire
Last edited:
Do you mean to wrap the channel around the timber so to speak? Or put it underneath?belt and braces , get a piece of 6 or 8x3 channel and drill some 14mm holes every 600mm and bolt or coach screw it to the bottom cord
put the flat back against the timber,ideal put the holes on the centre line of the timber (negative axis) you could weld a few tabs under the channel and sit them tight against the bottom of the timberDo you mean to wrap the channel around the timber so to speak? Or put it underneath?
belt and braces , get a piece of 6 or 8x3 channel and drill some 14mm holes every 600mm and bolt or coach screw it to the bottom cord
its 21 ft i think it would be better one piece are those barriers about 15ft seen them used on a lean to as posts did a good jobAs Ff posted but a cheaper way is box type crash barrier.
its 21 ft i think it would be better one piece are those barriers about 15ft seen them used on a lean to as posts did a good job
never thought of that they would make good strainers and weld gate hinges on them ,know that may tip some of the fencing lads over the edge!They are 16' I weld them together,cheap at £32 each.
I'm also cutting them in half for fence strainers.
Sounds like the TFF collective have come up with a broadly workable solution then I'll price up a piece of channel vs price of some crash barrier and go from there. Presumably I'll have to take that piece of ply off to get the steel to fit flat along the wooden beam?
The only other solution I can think of is to replace the ply with a wider and taller piece of steel plate and bolt it through in several spots. I don't think the timber beam is too weak as such it's only the join I the middle that worries me.
Times like this I wish I understood a bit more about forces and loads within a structure as I did wonder if the horizontal beam was actually even carrying much weight or is it basically tying the station posts together which in turn supports the apex as if the ridge needed to move down (to collapse) the legs would need to move outwards??
Or could be totally wrong