Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Politics, Covid19 and Brexit
John Redwoods Letter to the Attorney General
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wanton dwarf" data-source="post: 6183406" data-attributes="member: 5903"><p>Not quite true is it ?</p><p></p><p>"On top of that, the UK would lose the benefit of free trade agreements it now has with countries such as South Korea and Canada as a member of the EU. Therefore, more British imports and exports would face tariffs."</p><p></p><p>That's down to individual countries to agree .. in fact you may find that these agreements stand anyway as some agreements predate the EU.</p><p></p><p>Rubber stamping existing treaties for continued use outside of the EU would amount to practical common sense.</p><p></p><p>"And it means UK services, which can now access the whole of the EU’s single market (i.e. currently, the 28 member states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) relatively freely, would only be allowed the much more restricted access of the EU and UK’s commitments in the WTO."</p><p></p><p>A trade agreement should have been agreed on Day 1.</p><p></p><p>Most of the issues 3 YEARS after the EU referendum could have been solved on Day 1 IF Theresa May had negotiated in the interests of the UK peoples and not the EU bureacracy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wanton dwarf, post: 6183406, member: 5903"] Not quite true is it ? "On top of that, the UK would lose the benefit of free trade agreements it now has with countries such as South Korea and Canada as a member of the EU. Therefore, more British imports and exports would face tariffs." That's down to individual countries to agree .. in fact you may find that these agreements stand anyway as some agreements predate the EU. Rubber stamping existing treaties for continued use outside of the EU would amount to practical common sense. "And it means UK services, which can now access the whole of the EU’s single market (i.e. currently, the 28 member states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) relatively freely, would only be allowed the much more restricted access of the EU and UK’s commitments in the WTO." A trade agreement should have been agreed on Day 1. Most of the issues 3 YEARS after the EU referendum could have been solved on Day 1 IF Theresa May had negotiated in the interests of the UK peoples and not the EU bureacracy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Politics, Covid19 and Brexit
John Redwoods Letter to the Attorney General
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top